0
George Murdock examined hundreds of different cultures in the 1940s to identify common traits and social institutions across human societies. His goal was to understand the basic elements of culture and how they varied across different societies, in order to formulate comparative analyses and generalizations about human behavior and social organization.
What else can I help you with?
What anthropologist compile a list of cultural universals?
George Murdock is the anthropologist who compiled a list of cultural universals in 1945. This list includes features found in every culture, such as language, marriage, cooking, and body adornment.
What did the hupa Indians trade?
According to "California Indians" by George Emanuels, "the Hupa hd acorns and obsidian, and some inland foods, to trade with their coastal neighbors. In return, they received dried seaweed from the coastal people from which they extracted salt. They bought (traded) their dugout canoes from the Yurok at the mouth of the Klamath River. pg 29
How do you know if someone is a reptilian?
People are not reptiles, reptiles are not people. Anyone who beleives otherwise is missing some important aspects of human intelligence. actually, people like George W. Bush have reptilian blood. he also does act in reptile ways at times. if you pay close attention, he flicks his tongue as a lizard would whilst trying to capture food or just randomly at times like they usually do. reptilian's are just another type of alien. there are many types of aliens. like the feline aliens, the annunaki, the REPTILIANS, the greys etc. also, orbs are known to be some type of alien. not spirits. this is why science is more accurate than thinking that once we die, little orbs float out of our bodies and roam around our homes.
Is there scientific evidence that Adam and Eve were the first humans?
There is no scientific evidence to support the story of Adam and Eve as being the first humans. The theory of evolution, supported by vast evidence from multiple scientific disciplines, indicates that humans evolved over millions of years from ape-like ancestors. The story of Adam and Eve is generally regarded as a religious myth rather than a historical account.
Did we evolve from chimpanzees or did God create us?
Note:Please note that there exists no hypothesis or theory that has mankind descending from chimpanzees or any other kind of modern non-human ape. One should read the below answers as answering the question "Did we evolve from apes or did God create us".Answer:That really depends on your world view. If you are a religious person who believes in a particular creation myth--a myth is a collection of stories that describe the beliefs of a culture--then you are more likely going to reject anything that contradicts your beliefs. In such cases, people feel personal experiences trump scientific evidence. If you are less religious or more science-minded, you are more likely to accept the evidence that shows man and chimps had a common ancestor who lived in Africa roughly 7 million years ago. Genetics, anatomy, psychology, and paleontology supports this. However, again, it depends on your world view.Answer:The above is one view, but as someone who has researched this topic from both the "religious" and "scientific" perspectives, that is not all there is to it. Though it is presented to the public that ALL the scientific evidence points to evolution, it doesn't. There is scientific evidence for creation, too, and the evidence for evolution is not conclusive, making believing in creation more than a mere "creation myth."If you want an answer to whether we evolved from chimpanzees or were created by God, it is something you have to decide for yourself. Some will claim that creation is totally religious based and that evolution is totally science based, which is just not the case. In order to come to an informed decision, you should approach the issue from the scientific perspective and find what science is available for each view. Don't expect your search to take a short time, though. The information is out there, but it takes effort to find it and put all the information together.Answer:The Jewish answer is that we have an unbroken national tradition of 3300 years to the Revelation at Sinai. God states that He created the universe (Genesis 1:1; Exodus 20:10) and human beings (Genesis ch.1-2). This tradition is accepted by Christianity and Islam also. God's creation of the universe explains the vast wisdom found within it.There are also some people who believe in Creation without quoting the Bible. Their reasoning includes:1) The glaring lack of transitional fossils has been noted by the evolutionists themselves, such as this statement from the famous paleontologist and evolutionist George G. Simpson; quote: "The regular lack of transitional fossils is not confined to primates alone, but is an almost universal phenomenon.""The lack of transitional series cannot be explained as being due to the scarcity of material. The deficiencies are real; they will never be filled" (Nilsson, N. Heribert)."To the unprejudiced, the fossil record of plants is in favor of special creation" (Corner, E.J.H., Contemporary Botanical Thought).2) Instances of falsifying of evidence by evolutionists, such as Haeckel's drawings, Archaeoraptor, the Cardiff "specimen," and Piltdown Man."Haeckel exaggerated the similarities [between embryos of different species] by idealizations and omissions, in a procedure that can only be called fraudulent. His drawings never fooled embryologists, who recognized his fudgings right from the start. The drawings, despite their noted inaccuracies, entered into the standard student textbooks of biology. Once ensconced in textbooks, misinformation becomes cocooned and effectively permanent, because textbooks copy from previous texts. We do, I think, have the right to be both astonished and ashamed by the century of mindless recycling that has led to the persistence of these drawings in a large number, if not a majority, of modern textbooks (Stephen Gould).Dr. Jonathan Wells published a book in 2002 entitled Icons of Evolution. Dr. Wells states that the book shows that "the best-known 'evidences' for Darwin's theory have been exaggerated, distorted or even faked."3) Creationists see the "survival of the fittest" and the dating of rock layers by fossils as being perfect tautologies.4) The fact that some qualified, educated, normal scientists do not believe in evolution. Or at least question it, even if they still preach evolution: "Nine-tenths of the talk of evolutionists is sheer nonsense, not founded on observation and wholly unsupported by facts. This museum is full of proofs of the utter falsity of their views. In all this great museum, there is not a particle of evidence of the transmutation of species" (Dr. Etheridge, Paleontologist of the British Museum)."To postulate that the development and survival of the fittest is entirely a consequence of chance mutations seems to me a hypothesis based on no evidence and irreconcilable with the facts. It amazes me that this is swallowed so uncritically and readily, and for such a long time, by so many scientists without murmur of protest" (Sir Ernest Chain, Nobel Prize winner).5) The fact that there is a shared, worldwide tradition among every ancient society that the world was created.6) Evolving of new species has not been witnessed during known history.7) Mutations are harmful, not beneficial. One of the tasks of DNA and of long-term breeding is to avoid or repair any changes brought about by mutations. This means that our genetic apparatus is programmed to resist change.8) Mutations, even if beneficial, do not create new organs.9) The fact that a great number of fossils have been found in the "wrong" rock-layers according to what evolutionary paleontology would require.10) The fact that you need DNA to make DNA. No genetic code can be demonstrated to have arisen by chance, together with the ability to read that code and carry out its instructions. Information does not arise spontaneously; and there is an incredible amount of information in even the tiniest cell."A living cell is so awesomely complex that its interdependent components stagger the imagination and defy evolutionary explanations" (Michael Denton, author)."The astounding structural complexity of a cell" (U.S. National Library of Medicine).Concerning a single structure within a cell: "Without the motor protein, the microtubules don't slide and the cilium simply stands rigid. Without nexin, the tubules will slide against each other until they completely move past each other and the cilium disintegrates. Without the tubulin, there are no microtubules and no motion. The cilium is irreducibly complex. Like a mousetrap, it has all the properties of design and none of the properties of natural selection" (Michael Behe, prof. of biophysics).11) The problem of the impossibility of abiogenesis in general. "The concept of abiogenesis is not science. It's fantasy" (J.L. Wile, Ph.D.).12) The fact that evolution was once used as support for the belief that Blacks (or others) are less than highly-evolved humans. "Darwin was also convinced that the Europeans were evolutionarily more advanced than the black races" (Steven Rose, author). He also "reasoned that males are more evolutionarily advanced than females" (B. Kevics, author).13. The first and second laws of thermodynamics point clearly to a Creator, since things undergo entropy rather than get more orderly over time.14. "Radiometric techniques may not be the absolute dating methods that they are claimed to be. Age-estimates on a given geological stratum by different radiometric methods are often very different. There is no absolutely reliable long-term radiological clock. The uncertainties inherent in radiometric dating are disturbing to geologists and evolutionists." William D. Stansfield, Ph.D., Instructor of Biology, California Polytechnic State University.15. "Even total rock systems may be open during metamorphism and may have their isotopic systems changed, making it impossible to determine their geologic age." Prof. Gunter Faure (Department of Geology, The Ohio State University, Columbus.)16 a). At current rates of erosion the amount of sea-floor sediments actually found do not support a "billions of years" age for the Earth.b) The amount of Sodium Chloride in the sea, also, is a small fraction of what the "old Earth" theory would postulate.c) The Earth's magnetic field is decaying too fast to extrapolate a long age for the Earth.d) The rate of accumulation of Moon-dust has been measured; and the amount of dust on the Moon was found to be vastly less than what scientists had predicted before the Moon-landings.e) Helium is generated by radioactive elements as they decay. The escape of this helium into the atmosphere can be measured. According to the Evolutionary age of the Earth there should be much more helium in the atmosphere, instead of the 0.05% that is actually there.
Where did george murdock examine hundreds of different cultures?
George Murdock was an anthropologist and professor at Yale University who developed a method to systematically collect organize ethnographic data. This system evolved into what is now known as Yale's Human Relations Area Files.
Why did george murdock examine hundreds of cultures in the 1940s?
George Murdock examined hundreds of cultures in the 1940s to identify patterns of similarities and differences in societal structures and behaviors. By conducting this cross-cultural analysis, he aimed to identify universal aspects of human culture and society, as well as variations that can exist across different cultural groups.
What is George Murdock's birthday?
George Murdock was born on June 25, 1930.
When was George Murdock born?
George Murdock was born on June 25, 1930.
When did George Murdock die?
George Murdock died on 1985-03-29.
When was George Murdock - actor - born?
George Murdock - actor - was born on 1930-06-25.
What exactly is a cross cultural?
Cross cultural was first developed in the 1930s Cross-Cultural Survey undertaken by George Peter Murdock as a way to describe how different people and cultures interact and how elements from one can appear in the other as a result.
What conclusion did george murdock make following his study of 324 societies?
George Murdock concluded that families, as social institutions, exist in every society he studied. He also noted that the family's primary function across cultures is to regulate reproduction and care for children.
How old is George Murdock?
US actor George Murdock was 81 years old when he died on April 30, 2012 (birthdate: June 25, 1930).
What are the elements of culture as posited by george murdock?
what are the elements of culture?
What is the birth name of Henry Murdoch?
Henry Murdoch's birth name is George Henry Murdock.
What did George Murdock believe?
George Murdock was an anthropologist who believed in cultural universals, which are patterns of behavior that are found in every culture around the world. He argued that certain cultural traits, like family structures and economic systems, were common across all societies, regardless of their level of development.
