Yes the Marlin was and is a great car. AMC had and still has a good rep for the workmanship and engineering. .
Check Hemmings Motor News.com No such car. It would have to be either an AMC or a Rambler. AMC didn't come into the picture until 1966. That car would be a Rambler and there are many models and body styles possible and it is all about condition. This site can help you, http://www.nadaguides.com/Classic-Cars/1964/Rambler
Check Hemmings Motor News.com No such car. It would have to be either an AMC or a Rambler. AMC didn't come into the picture until 1966. That car would be a Rambler and there are many models and body styles possible and it is all about condition. This site can help you, http://www.nadaguides.com/Classic-Cars/1964/Rambler
A FRIEND OF MINE JUST BOUGHT 1 FROM JONNSBURO, Arkansas, ITS VERY NICE, . ALL EQ. WORKS EVEN A/C
In 1965, American Motors Corporation (AMC) produced approximately 200,000 vehicles. This included various models such as the Rambler, Marlin, and the AMC Ambassador. The year marked a significant period for AMC as they aimed to strengthen their market presence amidst competition from the Big Three automakers.
AMC American Motors.
The maximum speed of the 1965 AMC Marlin coupe manual 6cyl 155hp is 110 mph.
The maximum speed of the 1965 AMC Marlin coupe automatic 8cyl 198hp is 127 mph.
The maximum speed of the 1965 AMC Marlin coupe automatic 8cyl 270hp is 86 mph.
Rambler made v-8 engines that I don't know much about. The 6 cylinder engines got very good mileage all things considered, I got around 24 mpg hwy with a 196 engine with auto trans, and you would probably get another couple of mpg with a manual trans.
All AMC in-line sixes fire 1-5-3-6-2-4. Frank Swygert, Publisher, "American Independent Magazine" (for AMC/Rambler vehicles) http://farna.home.att.net/AIM.html
you should buy neither because both of them sort of suck, ok face the facts here the do suck, but if your still thinking of buying any get the rambler rebel. this was written by a car shop owner