We can't really compare the Ledendary Arthur to a real one because, being Legendary, we don't know if he actually existed, and if he did, everything we know about him is Legendary.
-~Iolaos~-
Probably, but nobody really knows for sure. All the historical references to him are either clearly fictional/fake or were written long after (like, hundreds of years after) he was supposedly king, and his actual existence is considered dubious. The general position of historians is that there MAY have been a "king", or at least local chieftain, whose name was at least somewhat similar to Arthur, but that if so, we don't really know anything about him. The various Arthur legends are pretty clearly just that: legends.
Morgan le Fay, a powerful sorceress in Arthurian legend, is typically associated with the magical island of Avalon. She is often depicted as ruling over Avalon as its queen and using her magical abilities to influence the events surrounding King Arthur and the Knights of the Round Table.
Atlantis is a legendary island first mentioned by Plato in his works. According to him, Atlantis was an advanced society that existed over 9,000 years before his own time. The island is said to have sunk into the sea in a single day and night. The exact location of Atlantis remains a mystery, and many theories exist about its possible existence.
Sutton Hoo is a location where centuries of burials took place along with Saxon tribes buried a ship and other burial goods. What is known is what has been found and researched by historians. There wasn't a "king" at Sutton Hoo, in fact, historians are not sure who exactly is buried there. Your question is basically asking the same thing about the same people.
King Ferdinand didn't really have many contributions. He is famously known for the contribution of society he made when he made a sacrifice to send Christopher Columbus to investigate the new world. Ferdinand and Isabell didn't really know if Christopher would come back with anything. They were surprised when he came back with Indian slaves known as the Tainos. Most of the Tainos were killed by diseases from the old world and really were not sure how to treat it as if they were clueless, it was like cancer back then, and now we have a cure.
King Arthur's historicity is likely never going to be confirmed or denied, due to lack of evidence from the period. What documents we do have, do mention notable Arthurs in the 5th and 6th century, not necessarily kings. Whether they are the basis of what we know as the folklore figure of today, we can't confirm.
Guinevere was the legendary queen consort of King Arthur. There is no date of birth indicated for her. At least not that I know of. Thus, it is an unverified story that has been handed down from generation to generation.
Lady Guinevere was 17 when she and King Arthur married. I want to know how old King arthur was and the internet is being stupid and not giving me an answer.
Max knows that King Arthur is a legendary figure in British folklore, often depicted as the ideal king of Britain, who led the Knights of the Round Table. He is associated with the magical sword Excalibur and the quest for the Holy Grail. Arthur's story blends history and myth, with various tales emphasizing themes of chivalry, heroism, and loyalty. His reign is often portrayed as a golden age of peace and prosperity.
i donot know
they didn't have glasses back then. mid 1800's they were made yes glass was mid 16-1700's but glasses are far more different, trust me. But keep in mind that nobody knows if King Arthur was a real person or not. Theres no real true proof.
Not that I know of, and I couldn't find anything about one on the internet. Make sure it is King Arthur.
Arthur got the sword out of the stone and was crownd the rightful king because he was son of the king and queen.
he died in 1988
Probably, but nobody really knows for sure. All the historical references to him are either clearly fictional/fake or were written long after (like, hundreds of years after) he was supposedly king, and his actual existence is considered dubious. The general position of historians is that there MAY have been a "king", or at least local chieftain, whose name was at least somewhat similar to Arthur, but that if so, we don't really know anything about him. The various Arthur legends are pretty clearly just that: legends.
Supposedly the Arthurian Legends are the longest-going English story of all time. But, apparently, they originated in Wales and Ireland, and the English just carried them on as their own story. So, really, we have no idea.
Its a legend! You didnt know that? You dumbasses! LMFAOO!