A historian is like a detective because they find out clues and use them as evidence.
They are not like historians because usually, they are not trying to solve a case, they are just trying to find out facts
Historian
The correct name for a historian's 'clue' is sources.
An archaeologist studies artifacts and physical remains of ancient civilizations to learn about past societies. They use tools such as excavation and analysis to piece together the history of human culture and behavior.
One potential strong counterclaim could be presenting evidence or eyewitness accounts that directly contradict the historian's claim. Additionally, analyzing alternative interpretations of the data provided by the historian could potentially weaken the strength of their claim. Alternatively, highlighting any biases or limitations in the historian's sources or methodology could also serve as a strong counterclaim.
A person who studies people from the past is called a historian. Historians analyze primary and secondary sources to understand and interpret past events, societies, and cultures. They may specialize in a particular time period or region.
Both a detective and an historian seek out facts. They both gather information of what has happened in the past. The detective tries to solve crimes that has all ready taken place. An historian tries to solve historical events, and gain an insight into people's lives, places they lived in, how they survived, and events that happened to them in history.
Historians are like detectives because both arrive at a scene after everything has occurred. Both the historian and the detective follow trials of evidence left from the past or peoples they are studying in order to find answers or reasons for events.
The historian was confused by the evidence presented to him. They were unable to get a definitive answer from the historian.
Oh, dude, it's like historians are all about digging up ancient gossip and piecing together historical events, while detectives are out there solving crimes and dealing with real-life drama. Basically, historians are like the nerdy older sibling who loves old stuff, and detectives are the cool younger sibling who's always chasing bad guys. Both are just trying to uncover the truth, but in their own unique ways.
it is a historian.
you could write, when i get older i would like to be a detective or a police officer
Detective novels have a detective or someone who is trying to solve a crime like a detective. Suspense novels just have cliff hangers and an air of mystery. Basically, detective novels can be suspense novels if they are suspenseful. Suspense novels can be detective novels if they have a detective or someone solving a mystery.
A person that solves mysteries is a detective.
A teacher but a detective is more appropriate.
The job description of a historian would read like this: * a person who studies records and artifacts from the past and writes a description of the findings; and * the historian also tries to interpret the findings and analyze what they mean and or how it affects other periods of history.
The correct possessive form of "historian" is "historian's." This form indicates that something belongs to or is associated with a specific historian. For example, you might say, "The historian's research was groundbreaking."
Historian