0
They helped look for riches. And they took over the main civilizations so they could get places faster.
What else can I help you with?
How did the expeditions of Cortes and Pizarro differ from those e of other Spanish explorers in the Americas?
Cortes and Pizarro's expeditions were characterized by their military conquests of powerful indigenous empires such as the Aztec and Inca, respectively. Unlike other explorers who focused on exploration and trade, Cortes and Pizarro sought to conquer and colonize territories for Spain. Their expeditions led to the fall of these empires and the establishment of Spanish control in the region.
What is all true of the conquests of Pizarro and Cortes?
Both Pizarro and Cortes were Spanish conquistadors who led successful expeditions in the Americas. They conquered the Aztec Empire under Cortes and the Inca Empire under Pizarro, bringing vast territories under Spanish control. Their conquests resulted in the downfall of powerful indigenous empires and the establishment of Spanish colonial rule in the Americas.
What are the three spanish explorers?
Three famous Spanish explorers are Christopher Columbus, Hernan Cortes, and Francisco Pizarro. Columbus is known for his voyages to the Americas, Cortes for the conquest of the Aztec Empire, and Pizarro for the conquest of the Inca Empire.
How do you Compare and contrast the exploration of Francisco Pizarro and Hernando Cortes?
Both Francisco Pizarro and Hernando Cortes were Spanish conquistadors who played key roles in the Spanish conquest of the Americas. Cortes is best known for his conquest of the Aztec Empire in present-day Mexico, while Pizarro is known for the conquest of the Inca Empire in present-day Peru. While both expeditions were marked by brutal tactics and the ultimate subjugation of indigenous peoples, Cortes had a more significant impact on Aztec society due to the downfall of their powerful empire, whereas Pizarro's conquest dismantled the Inca Empire's political structure without completely eradicating their culture.
What is the differences between hernan cortez and francisco Pizarro?
Hernan Cortes conquered the Aztec Empire in Mexico, while Francisco Pizarro conquered the Inca Empire in Peru. Their conquests were key in the Spanish colonization of the Americas. Cortes was known for his cunning tactics, while Pizarro was known for his ruthless approach in dealing with the Inca.
When did Hernan Cortes and Francisco Pizarro come to the Americas?
1519 :)
How did the expeditions of Cortes and Pizarro differ from those e of other Spanish explorers in the Americas?
Cortes and Pizarro's expeditions were characterized by their military conquests of powerful indigenous empires such as the Aztec and Inca, respectively. Unlike other explorers who focused on exploration and trade, Cortes and Pizarro sought to conquer and colonize territories for Spain. Their expeditions led to the fall of these empires and the establishment of Spanish control in the region.
What is all true of the conquests of Pizarro and Cortes?
Both Pizarro and Cortes were Spanish conquistadors who led successful expeditions in the Americas. They conquered the Aztec Empire under Cortes and the Inca Empire under Pizarro, bringing vast territories under Spanish control. Their conquests resulted in the downfall of powerful indigenous empires and the establishment of Spanish colonial rule in the Americas.
Who were cruelly treated by Cortes and Pizarro?
The Aztecs and Inca were cruelly treated by Cortes and Pizarro.
What are the three spanish explorers?
Three famous Spanish explorers are Christopher Columbus, Hernan Cortes, and Francisco Pizarro. Columbus is known for his voyages to the Americas, Cortes for the conquest of the Aztec Empire, and Pizarro for the conquest of the Inca Empire.
How did the success of Cortes and Pizarro affect later explorations of the Americas?
They helped look for riches. And they took over the main civilizations so they could get places faster.
How do you Compare and contrast the exploration of Francisco Pizarro and Hernando Cortes?
Both Francisco Pizarro and Hernando Cortes were Spanish conquistadors who played key roles in the Spanish conquest of the Americas. Cortes is best known for his conquest of the Aztec Empire in present-day Mexico, while Pizarro is known for the conquest of the Inca Empire in present-day Peru. While both expeditions were marked by brutal tactics and the ultimate subjugation of indigenous peoples, Cortes had a more significant impact on Aztec society due to the downfall of their powerful empire, whereas Pizarro's conquest dismantled the Inca Empire's political structure without completely eradicating their culture.
What is the differences between hernan cortez and francisco Pizarro?
Hernan Cortes conquered the Aztec Empire in Mexico, while Francisco Pizarro conquered the Inca Empire in Peru. Their conquests were key in the Spanish colonization of the Americas. Cortes was known for his cunning tactics, while Pizarro was known for his ruthless approach in dealing with the Inca.
What did Herman Cortes and Pizarro have in common?
Hernan Cortes and Francisco Pizarro were both Spanish conquistadors who played significant roles in the Spanish colonization of the Americas. They led expeditions that resulted in the defeat of the Aztec Empire in Mexico (Cortes) and the Inca Empire in Peru (Pizarro) during the 16th century. Both are known for their ruthless tactics and ambition for wealth and power.
Who were five explorers of the age of exploration?
Christopher Columbus Herman Cortes Francisco Pizarro Vasco De Gama Ferdinand Magellan Bartolomeu Dias
What did he expeditions of Herman Cortes and Francisco Pizarro resulted in?
The expeditions of Hernan Cortes resulted in the conquest of the Aztec Empire in present-day Mexico. Francisco Pizarro's expeditions led to the conquest of the Inca Empire in present-day Peru. Both conquests greatly expanded Spanish influence in the Americas.
Who is related to Francisco Pizarro?
Cortes
