0
Historians should emphasize both agriculture and human sacrifice, as they were both important aspects of many ancient societies. Agriculture played a crucial role in the development of civilization by providing sustenance and enabling population growth, while human sacrifice was a significant cultural and religious practice that shaped social orders and belief systems. By examining both, historians can gain a more comprehensive understanding of the complexities of ancient societies.
What else can I help you with?
Why should historians emphasize based on agriculture?
Historians should emphasize agriculture because it was the foundation of early societies, shaping culture, technology, and social structures. The development of agriculture led to settled communities, surplus food production, and specialization of labor, which were critical for the advancement of civilizations. Additionally, studying agricultural practices can provide insights into environmental impacts, social inequalities, and global trade connections throughout history.
When conducting research for forming a hypothesis which practice should historians follow?
Historians should conduct thorough research by examining primary and secondary sources, analyzing existing historiography, and critically evaluating evidence before formulating a hypothesis. It is essential to consider the context in which historical events occurred and to approach the research with objectivity and openness to different interpretations.
Explain how slash and burn agriculture worked?
farmers cleared the land by cutting down trees.then they burn the trees and used the ashes to fertilize the soil.Finally they planted crops on the cleared land.Duh it should be in your text book.:)
How was it decided when the Aztecs should plan crops or hold ceremonies?
The Aztecs based their agricultural and ceremonial calendar on their religious beliefs and the movements of celestial bodies. They had a complex system that involved multiple calendars – a solar calendar for agriculture and a sacred calendar for ceremonies. Priests studied these calendars to determine the most auspicious times for planting, harvesting, and conducting rituals.
Why did the Aztecs build a city in lake Texcoco?
The Aztecs built the city on lake Texcoco because they believed that the sign from their god of an Eagle eating a serpent on a cactus ment that they should build their city there.Also One, for military defensive purpose, two, they had a vision of an eagle eating of a Eagle eating a serpent on a cactus
Why should historians emphasize based on agriculture?
Historians should emphasize agriculture because it was the foundation of early societies, shaping culture, technology, and social structures. The development of agriculture led to settled communities, surplus food production, and specialization of labor, which were critical for the advancement of civilizations. Additionally, studying agricultural practices can provide insights into environmental impacts, social inequalities, and global trade connections throughout history.
A sentence for emphasize?
We should emphasize on improving our verbals skills. This is a sentence containing emphasize.
What is Emphasize in a sentence?
We should emphasize on our studies more. This is a sample sentence containing emphasize.
How can I use emphasize in a sentence?
I should not have to emphasize further. Let me emphasize my most poignant points.
What subjects should you have for a agriculture course?
maths and agriculture as a subject
Which scale degree should a listener use to determine the mode of a selection?
just emphasize what do the chords notes emphasize to start to
When should historians be capitalized?
Historians should be capitalized when it is used as part of a proper noun, such as when referring to a specific group or organization like the American Historical Association. However, when used generically to refer to individuals who study or write about history, it is not capitalized. For example, "Many historians attended the conference" would not capitalize historians, but "The Historians' Society hosted a symposium" would capitalize it.
Which emperor willed on his life that the Roman empire should be split into two parts?
No emperor declared that the empire should be split into two parts. It was historians that made the distinction in order to avoid confusion.No emperor declared that the empire should be split into two parts. It was historians that made the distinction in order to avoid confusion.No emperor declared that the empire should be split into two parts. It was historians that made the distinction in order to avoid confusion.No emperor declared that the empire should be split into two parts. It was historians that made the distinction in order to avoid confusion.No emperor declared that the empire should be split into two parts. It was historians that made the distinction in order to avoid confusion.No emperor declared that the empire should be split into two parts. It was historians that made the distinction in order to avoid confusion.No emperor declared that the empire should be split into two parts. It was historians that made the distinction in order to avoid confusion.No emperor declared that the empire should be split into two parts. It was historians that made the distinction in order to avoid confusion.No emperor declared that the empire should be split into two parts. It was historians that made the distinction in order to avoid confusion.
You have finished your BSC Agriculture and what you do after bsc?
after of all i should given a jrf exam for msc in agriculture
Should the genetic engineering in agriculture should stop or continue?
continue
What should be included to emphasize the proper treatment of detainees?
Five S's and T
Lending to agriculture should be at least --- percent?
20%
