answersLogoWhite

0

No, he is a fictitious king.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Archaeology

Is there proof that King Arthur is or was a real living person?

There is no concrete historical evidence to prove that King Arthur was a real living person. The stories of King Arthur are largely based on folklore, legends, and myths rather than documented historical accounts.


What are facts that prove King Arthur was a real person?

There is no concrete historical evidence that proves King Arthur was a real person. The stories of King Arthur are largely based on myth and legend, with some scholars suggesting that he may have been a composite of multiple historical figures. The lack of reliable contemporary records and the fantastical elements of the Arthurian legend make it difficult to establish the existence of a historical King Arthur.


Where is the real sword in the stone?

The real sword in the stone is a popular legend associated with King Arthur, where he only could pull out the sword and become king. The mythological sword is believed to be located in various places, but no definitive proof of its existence has been found.


Is there a connection between King Arthur and the king of Scotland?

There is no historical evidence to suggest a direct connection between King Arthur and the king of Scotland. King Arthur is a legendary figure in British mythology, while the king of Scotland has been a real monarch with a line of succession. The two figures belong to different realms of history and folklore.


Is the excalibur real?

No, it is legendary. In the earliest stories about King Arthur, his sword is called Calibern. Crappy answer.