answersLogoWhite

0

Primary and Secondary.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Archaeology

What are two types of evidence that historians use?

Historians use primary sources, which are firsthand accounts or original documents from the time period being studied, and secondary sources, which are interpretations or analyses of primary sources by other historians. Both types of evidence are important in constructing an accurate and comprehensive understanding of historical events.


What are two types of archetypes?

Two types of archetypes are the hero, who is on a journey to conquer evil and achieve greatness, and the mentor, who guides and supports the hero on their journey with wisdom and guidance.


What are two possible problems a researcher should be aware of when using primary sources?

Two possible problems that a researcher should be aware of when using primary sources are bias and authenticity. Primary sources can be biased based on the perspective of the author or creator, so researchers should critically evaluate the information presented. Additionally, researchers should confirm the authenticity of primary sources to ensure that they are trustworthy and reliable for their research purposes.


What are the Types of history?

The main types of history include political history (focuses on governments and rulers), social history (examines society and culture), economic history (studies economic systems and development), and cultural history (explores art, literature, and ideas). Other types include military history, environmental history, and gender history.


What two pieces of evidence does dunn offer to support his claim that ibn battuta did not actually take this trip?

Dunn offers two main pieces of evidence to support his claim that Ibn Battuta did not actually take his entire journey as detailed in his writings. Firstly, he highlights the lack of specific details, inconsistencies, and inaccuracies in Ibn Battuta's accounts. Secondly, Dunn points out that there are no contemporaneous accounts or corroboration of Ibn Battuta's travels from other sources, casting doubt on the authenticity of his claims.