Yes, for example the San Andreas Fault is a plate boundary.
The san Andreas fault is a transform boundary between two plates. The resultant fault of a transform boundary is a strike-slip fault. The North American plate and the Pacific plate are both moving vertically in different directions.
The Kamchatka earthquake was on the Pacific plate.
Plate boundaries around Japan are convergent boundaries ie two plates are sliding towards each other. Japan has been formed as a result of the subduction of the Philippine Sea Plate beneath the continental Amurian Plate and Okinawa Plate to the south, and subduction of the Pacific Plate under the Okhotsk Plate to the north.
The Mid-Atlantic Ridge is a divergent plate boundary, also known as a spreading center.
The plate boundary the Chile earthquake occurred on in 2010 was the converging boundary. A converging boundary is when two plates move closer together. In this case the converging boundary moved so close together that the plates hut one another. They then subducted under on another and the earthquake was formed.
Fault line
It is a transform plate boundary.
That is called a boundary or a transform-fault boundary. :D
A transform fault boundary is a conservative plate boundary. This is what gets rid of lithosphere.
Divergent plate boundary: Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Transform plate boundary: San Andreas Fault.
It is on a transform fault boundary.
A transform boundary.
The San Andreas Fault is a transform plate boundary.
actually it is not a plate boundary it is a fault a strike slip fault -les bois student014
It is called a divergent plate boundary.
The San Andreas fault is a transform plate boundary.
It is called a fault