yep x
If you're talking about the real life King Arthur, the only battle that people can decide conclusively that he fought in was the Battle of Badon Hill, where he defeated the Saxons. The battle at the end of the King Arthur film from 2004 is based on that battle. However, we really don't know that much about Arthur from history, as there isn't much archeology supporting his existence. Most scholars don't even think he was a king, but rather a war leader who brought peace to his area for close to half a century. If you were talking about the fantasy Arthur, then I can't really help you.
He feels that Arthur and his men are overmatched.
Because it is said that King lancelot and Guienvere Tricked arthur in going to war with mordred it is said that Mordred is getting Revenge on arthur by Stealing the throne and His wife. Ps:Read Records and you will find out alot about him
buy dog food with lettuce and tomato and mustard"(:
Excalibur was not the sword in the stone. Excalibur was given to King Arthur by the Lady in the Lake. The sword in the stone was Caledfwlch the sword of Uther Pendragon, Arthur's father.For your other Question, Clarent was a ceremonial sword used in the knighting process by Arthur's father, Uther,. Clarent was later stolen from Arthur by his half-sisters son Mordred where it was used to mortally would Arthur in the Battle of Camlann.
Arthur won the war.
If you're talking about the real life King Arthur, the only battle that people can decide conclusively that he fought in was the Battle of Badon Hill, where he defeated the Saxons. The battle at the end of the King Arthur film from 2004 is based on that battle. However, we really don't know that much about Arthur from history, as there isn't much archeology supporting his existence. Most scholars don't even think he was a king, but rather a war leader who brought peace to his area for close to half a century. If you were talking about the fantasy Arthur, then I can't really help you.
If you're talking about the real life King Arthur, the only battle that people can decide conclusively that he fought in was the Battle of Badon Hill, where he defeated the Saxons. The battle at the end of the King Arthur film from 2004 is based on that battle. However, we really don't know that much about Arthur from history, as there isn't much archeology supporting his existence. Most scholars don't even think he was a king, but rather a war leader who brought peace to his area for close to half a century. If you were talking about the fantasy Arthur, then I can't really help you.
King Authur was a good King who turn out to fight in a war.
Historians don't even know when king arthur really live, if he was a real person or anything specifics about his history. So its impossible to tell you when he went to war
Being English and being British are currently considered the more or less same thing. However, in the fifth century, after the departure of the Romans from Britannia, there is the legend of war between the Britons (Welsh) defenders against the invading English (Anglo Saxons). The legend has the Britons under King Arthur finally defeating the Anglo Saxons and halting the invasion at the battle of Badon Hill in 495 AD.
i once red a biography on king Arthur and it sees that king Arthur is based on a British war lord called Art which means bair
King arthur was a thoughtful person. He was Brave and Caring. Then Morderd went and broke his heart and he lost his bravery in the middle of a war and the evil people took camelot.
There was no queen. However the king during World War 2 was King George VI (Albert Frederick Arthur George)
The blowing up of the USS Maine
a variety of nations. Including the Japaneese along with the Germans.suck crap
It went to war aginst Germany and then later the Ottoman empire too.