Rene Descartes philosophy of logic and rationality led him to come to the conclusion that God must exist. Without his existence, there is not explanation for the universe.
Aztec gods like bread and wine
The gods and spirits were said to be supernatural. So too were the gods of the white man.
The missionary calls the Igbo gods false gods that have no real power. He is soundly laughed off by most of the people there as mad.
Enoch did not say anything specific, but indicated that he thought that the gods of his fathers were a sham compared to the Christian gods and system.
They believe the white man has a spiritual power through their gods, that prevents the other gods from killing them.
there are none... it's called faith
No definitely not. He is famous for attempting to prove Gods existence through his ontological arguments.
A:All gods are real to those who believe in them. All gods are fake to those who do not believe. And all gods - the Christian God, the Hindu gods, the Chinese gods and so on - share one thing in common. We can not absolutely prove their non-existence; we can only say that they are most unlikely to be real.
All religions are equally good - or equally unable - at proving the existence of their god(s) of choice.
Buddhism is non-theistic. It neither needs or recognizes gods as agents of answering prayers, helping or hindering mankind or being judges of human behaviour. The need to prove or disprove the existence of gods is unimportant
They have faith.
The only valid proof of the existence of ghosts or of gods or of anything at all is the proof by example. Someone must produce a ghost or a god or a heffalump which is verified by the senses (non-distorting aids like telescopes, microscopes, and amplifiers are OK, transformative aids like Photoshop are not) of experts judged to be credible both by believers in the idea in question and by nonbelievers. Until a ghost or a god is produced for public evaluation their existence may be considered doubtful but unproven.
Sophists
Sophists we skeptical about the existence of gods.
It's a concept coined by Bertrand Russell for the discussion of whether it's possible to prove the non-existence of god. He said that it's possible to claim there's a teapot orbiting beyond Jupiter, but no-one would believe you, so everyone is a teapot atheist without having to prove it isn't there. In a similar way, it isn't possible to prove the non-existence of gods, but that doesn't mean it make sense to think they actually exist.
To prove he was strongest
Not applicable. We believe in One God, who created the universe. We have no "gods" or idols.