Newton's law of inertia applies: A body in motion tends to stay in motion, and a body at rest tends to stay at rest. This applies to earthquakes because a building or other large, fixed object is "at rest" and is not designed to be in motion. When the land vibrates and moves under a building due to an earthquake, the building has the contravening forces of inertia (the at-rest building tends to try to stay at rest) versus the ground under the building moving, and the ground doesn't play nice by moving smoothly and continuously in one direction. If it were not for inertia, the building and its contents (including people!) would simply move with the ground, and neither the building nor its contents would suffer damage.
Earthquakes can cause a volcano to erupt.
earthquakes and volcano's are related in some sorts of ways, one of these ways are the damage they do.
* China * Iraq * Japan * Iran For details of the world's worst earthquakes, see the related link.
Theory of law. Theory of the climate. Theory of lax. Theory of vandals. Newtons's theory of mass.
They are both caused by movement of tectonic plates.
It isn't.
It isn't closely related. Newton's Third Law is more closely related to conservation of MOMENTUM.
Force=mass*acceleration
they both are always making time and is always in motion
yes it is friction referring to newtons law F = ma Good luck
It states newtons law of gravitation
Its a matter of being scientifically rigorous. You can not claim the 2nd law as a law unless you first establish the first law.
mass, acceleration, motion - speed and velocity, newtons 1st law force = mass * acceleration speed requires force to change force acts on velocity to change it newtons 1st law describes force
As we pull the water, our bodies move forward. Thus, that is an opposite reaction from pulling.
F=ma Input: newtons second law at wolframalpha.com
No, but earthquakes and MOONquakes are related
for every force, there is equal force acting in the opposite direction