What would happen if grasses and shrubs were removed from an ecosystem?
A.the primary consumers would increaseB.the primary consumers would become secondary consumersC.the primary consumers would die out or move elsewhereD.the primary consumers would stay unchanged
In Europe
There are many things that are likely to happen by 2023. For example, artificial intelligence will have made major strides by 2023, and personal computers will be much more advanced.
Honestly, hip dermals don't last very long. And with your belly growing and what not they would most likely push themselves out unless you get them removed really early.
Not likely. Tattoo ink may be removed from the blood, but it would appear in trace amounts in urine.
It can cause a Tsunami a huge sea wave.
.
Removing grasses and shrubs from a rural New Jersey ecosystem will likely disrupt the habitat for many species that depend on them for food and shelter, leading to a decrease in biodiversity. It may also result in increased soil erosion and reduced water infiltration, impacting the overall ecosystem health.
The octopus and shark populations will decline.
The octopus and shark populations will decline.
If all limiting factors are removed, populations of organisms would likely experience unrestricted growth and potentially exceed the carrying capacity of their environment. This could lead to competition for resources, reduction in biodiversity, and ecosystem instability. Ultimately, it may result in a collapse of the ecosystem due to resource depletion.
The sloth and coati populations would increase.
more limewater would be present that some life may die from
The sloth and coati populations would increase.
If most of the bacteria and fungi were removed from an ecosystem, the decomposition of organic matter would slow significantly, leading to the accumulation of dead plant and animal material. Nutrient cycling would be disrupted, resulting in decreased soil fertility and impaired plant growth. This would ultimately affect the entire food web, as herbivores would struggle to find adequate food sources, potentially leading to declines in their populations and affecting higher trophic levels. Overall, the ecosystem's health and resilience would be severely compromised.
If a primary consumer was removed from an ecosystem the secondary consumer would more than likely adapt to survive. History has shown us that some species are better than others at adapting and the more versatile a species is, the longer they survive. Now more species than ever are in danger because of their natural habitat being destroyed, but on the positive side there are many more convenience stores open now which will give them a fighting chance.
If all soil in an ecosystem washed away, it would likely lead to the loss of essential nutrients for plants to grow, result in decreased plant productivity, and impact the entire food web by reducing habitat for many organisms. It would ultimately disrupt the ecosystem's balance and lead to widespread ecological damage.
republicans