Georges Seurat, the French post-impressionist painter known for developing the technique of pointillism, experienced moderate financial success during his lifetime. While he gained recognition for his innovative artistic style, he did not achieve significant wealth. His work became more celebrated and valuable after his untimely death in 1891, leading to a posthumous increase in his financial legacy. Thus, while he was not wealthy while alive, his art has since contributed to his lasting legacy.
There are many answers. 1. The rich can take reaction, the poor are helpless. 2. The rich can pay you, but the poor don't have money. 3. Most of the rich are well known so a big issue could take place if you tried to attack them. 4. The rich have guards, the poor don't. 5. The rich have weapons, the poor don't.
van gogh was poor.
She was not rich, but not very poor either.
Martin Cooper was rich
poor
no, i think he was not rich.
Daniel Catton Rich has written: 'Henri Rousseau' 'Seurat and the evolution of \\'
rich and poor
It is rich and poor . It is rich and poor .
Neither, not rich or poor.
who knows the lady can be rich or poor who knows the lady can be rich or poor who knows the lady can be rich or poor
Yes it it rich and poor. Which country?
poor
not rich or poor
in beenteen rich and poor
rich and poor
he was poor, then rich after his music