yes they destroy lots of land thats why it is listed under the natrual disaster list
Butts are the most dangerous
You can find out more about earthquake insurance. You can do this by going to en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earthquake_insurance and www.walletpop.com/2010/01/.../earthquake-insurance-is-it-worth-it/.
are you asking which is more dangerous because if so volcano's are very dangerous but they don't happen as often as earthquake's. earthquakes would be more dangerous because they happen very often tearing down many home and countries also volcano's are pretty bad as well but there aren't very many of them so the answer would be an earth quake.
maybe; the more powerful the earthquake, the more likely you are to feel it.
yes
30 times more energy released. 10 times more ground motion*
Earthquake itself is not dangerous if you know how to response. as long as you are on the right place, for example on an open place or inside seismic resistant buildings, etc you will be fine. Many people killed during earthquake because of panic and do wrong thing. tsunami triggered by underwater earthquake and off course more more more dangerous than earthquake. for example if there is no tsunami in sendai, miyagi, iwate area (march 11, 2011) the people killed will be not so significant. tsunami is the most dangerous natural disaster in the world.
Not really; it's more of a natural disaster.
Typhoon, Flood, Earthquake, Tornado and many more.
a tsunami
An earthquake in the ocean is dangerous than on land because in the ocean if it occurs it can generate an earthquake which can cause more destruction than an earthaquake on land
surface waves are more dangerous than body waves with up and down movements.
There is no reason in theory why you could not have a natural disaster, such as an earthquake, a hurricane, etc., in which there is no loss of life. However, the bigger the disaster, the more likely it becomes that there will be some deaths.
if there is a natural disaster like an earthquake, the prices go up because more people need them all at once
By definition yes a blizzard could be considered a natural disaster... (definition) A natural disaster is the effect of a natural hazard (e.g. flood, tornado, volcano eruption, earthquake, or landslide) that affects the environment, and leads to financial, environmental and/or human losses. ... en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_disaster
Radiation disasters are made for spreading, so it more dangerous than chemical disasters
A violent, usually destructive natural occoruance.Example:Meteor StrikeLarge Volcanic Erouption(Something in nature that happens and causes a lot of damage.)
Many people consider the recent earthquake in Japan (8.9 on Richter Scale) to be unprecendented in devastation.