It is legal, but it is not wise. If you post such signs, and a crime is committed that the cameras should have detected, you can be held liable, in that the victim had valid reason to believe cameras were in existence. Also, I would add that, if you posted the signs, it shows that YOU believe that the area in question is dangerous enough to require camera surveilance. Not having cameras where you know they're required can be construed as negligence.
There is none There is none There is none There is none There is none
AnswerCameras have gone from stand still cameras to instant. There films have changed there lenses,the size,lots have things have changed about cameras.there size has changed and the way the picturers come out.also back then cameras took in black and white but now they take in full color.
You can pick one of three possible answers to this question, all of which are accurate.The first answer is that any camera used within its limitations is capable of taking superb photographs. As such, any camera is as good as any other. Don't worry about it; just get out there and take photographs.The second answer is that all cameras of the same type and in the same price range will take photos of roughly the same quality. There are differences, but you'll have to look pretty hard to see them.The final answer is that no, not all cameras are equal. There are enormous differences between cameras, and some of them are detailed below.* Optics. Some lenses (and for those cameras with built-in lenses, cameras) will be sharper and have fewer technical defects (like chromatic aberration) than others. * Metering.Some cameras have far superior light meters to others; Nikon's "matrix" evaluative metering system is alleged to be among the best here. Spot-meters and center-weighted meters as found on pre-80s 35mm film cameras will result in less accurate exposures than a modern evaluative metering system. * Sensors and firmware, on digital cameras, vary hugely from camera to camera. Some sensors have less noise and more dynamic range (able to accurately render a wider contrast range) than others. None of this should concern you if you have a camera already; refer to the first, and best answer on this count. In any case, a technically flawless photograph is not the same thing as a great photograph, or even a good one. Someone with an eye for colour, light, shape and texture will make a far superior photograph on a cheap point-and-shoot camera than someone without the eye for such things shooting the most expensive digital SLR available.
None
none
None...
None.
none
It goes to the legal spouse if none then legal children if none then family if none then government take it.
There was no security. None was needed.
There are none, he lived and died before cameras were invented.
You might require a fake camera for home security. Criminals will think twice before attempting anything malicious on your property if they see the place is wired with security cameras. However, real security camera systems are expensive and require a lot of upkeep. Fake ones offer the illusion of security to ward off criminals for a fraction of the cost and with none of the upkeep.
none
There are none.
I would say none. I would say none.
Vietnam Information Security Association's motto is 'none'.
none