No, it is not a conjunction. The word looked is a verb. It is the past tense and past participle of the verb to look. But it is not used as an adjective, either.
No, it is not a conjunction. It is the past tense of the verb or auxiliary verb to do.
No, it is not a conjunction. It is an adjective, or a noun for a temperature or a minor illness.
Yes, it is a subordinating conjunction. (It is somewhat dubiously said to be a preposition as well)
No. The word 'regularly' is not a conjunction, but an adverb. It describes how or when something is done, e.g. I wash my car regularly. A conjunction is used to join part of a sentence, and the word 'regularly' does not serve that function.
Or is a coordinating conjunction.
Indicators
Indicator
1. risk2. threat3. indicator4. critical information item
The correct and commonly accepted phrase is “in conjunction with.” “In conjunction to” is generally considered incorrect in standard English.
Yes, it is a subordinating conjunction. It connects a restrictive clause.
No, "wow" is not a conjunction. It's an interjection.
It is a conjunction.
There is no conjunction of will not.Maybe you mean contraction.If you do then won't is the contraction
The word are is not a conjunction. It is a verb.
No, it is not a conjunction. The word be is a verb.
no better is not a conjunction
It can be a conjunction, as well as an adverb. As a subordinating conjunction, it connects restrictive dependent clauses.