There are essentially two schools of (rational) thought on the matter of Arthur's historicity.
One says that the Arthur legends may have been at least very loosely based on some actual person, whom we know pretty much nothing about.
The other says that the whole thing was entirely made up and even looking for a historical basis for Arthur is a waste of time.
You'll note that neither of them goes so far as to say anything about historical evidence, because there is none of any value.
There are historical documents that mention Arthur, but the ones known not to be actual forgeries are themselves histories written several centuries after his purported time (6th century; the documents themselves are from the 10th-12th century period). Well-attested actual 6th century documents say nothing about him, or any names that at all strongly resemble "Arthur".
His tomb and remains were found on Glastonbury Island along with the remains of a female skeleton, which is considered to be Guenevere
He pulled the sword out of the stone
No, the story of King Arthur is from England during Medieval times (Knights of the round table, sword in the stone, all that). Answer 2: Well, not really England. Britain yes, but the Celtic fringe - Scotland, Cornwall, Wales. Even thought they believed his tomb to be in Glastonbury, Somerset. He was the focus and inspiration of late Celtic mythology.
"who WAS Merlin?'' you talk as if he is dead, for that is impossible for he lives outside of time. but to answer your question, he IS a fabled wizard who has extraordinary powers, who was the long loved advisor of the high king arthur.
Arthurian Legend is a great cycle of Mediaeval European romance concerning the life and times of King Arthur, the semi-historical defender of Romanized Celtic Britain from the invading barbarian Anglo-Saxons, after the departure of the Roman legions. The Arthurian Legend is a collection of stories written about king arthur and this time period
Pendragon. The many small Celtic Kings of Britain were called 'dragons'. Sometime after 410 AD these kings elected a King of Kings - a 'Pendragon'.
There are no references of this. It is said that Mark was Arthur's cousin. Mark, it ius claimed ran Cornwall from Tintagel Castle. This was also the location of Arthur's conception. There are many versions of Marks story, many refer to Mark and Celtic links.
Arthur was associated with Celtic mythology,although he was a historical figure from around the fifth or sixth centuries,after the Romans left Britain in the period that is known as The Dark Ages.In the Athurian saga,centered on the adventures of The Knights of the Round-Table.Arthur is a Medieval King.There appears to be no contemporary Celtic references to Arthur,either as a historical or as a legendary figure,although he did become involved in the story of Culhwch and in the story of the journey to Annw to acquire the enchanted cauldron.Arthur is associated with Celtic myth but this may have been a postdated association.It is likely that he came to power in the dying days of the Celts and that the stories surrounding him grew as they were driven farther and farther from their native land.Certainly there seems to be little,if any,evidence to link Arthur to the Celtic period. King Arthur, as such, is a legend. But it is highly probable that there was a Romano-British leader in the fifth century who commanded Celtic tribes in successful resistance to the invading Anglo-Saxons and is the basis on which the legends were built. Read "The Discovery of King Arthur" by Geoffrey Ashe for a very good exploration of the idea. He argues very strongly that the man behind the legend was a commander known to history as Riothimus. He is the only known figure who actually did some things which parallel the legend at about the right time. Riothimous seems to be a title rather than a name so his real name could have been...Who knows?...Arthur? King Arthur was a local tribal chieftain of the Britons of the west of England. His base was supposedly the spectacular Tintagel castle in Cornwall. His kingdoms name was camolot
King Arthur never ruled Celtic tribes. He ruled the ancient BRITTONS
The name 'Arthur' can mean 'bear' (derived from Celtic Artos) or 'stone' (derived from Celtic Art.)
pi
yes
King Arthur.
The history of England goes back thousands of years. There were Saxon tribes and the Celtic tribes who lived there. Some of the oldest historical evidence of man has been uncovered in England, Ireland, Scotland, and Wales.
No, King Arthur is not believed to have been an Anglo-Saxon. He is a legendary figure from Celtic mythology and is associated with the Britons, who were a Celtic people. The Anglo-Saxons arrived in Britain centuries after the time when King Arthur is said to have lived.
Nobody really knows, but it might be from a Celtic word meaning "stone".
Arthur Herbert Leahy has written: 'Heroic Romances of Ireland' -- subject(s): Celtic Mythology, Epic literature, Irish, Heroes, Irish Epic literature, Legends, Mythology, Celtic, Tales, Translations into English
There is no evidence that Ryan was in a car accident.
Celtic fans are called the Tims by some rival supporters as a derogatory term, based on the historical association of the club with the Catholic community in Glasgow. The term is considered offensive by many Celtic supporters.