There might have been a King Arthur, but there is no historical evidence to back up the stories of the Knights of the Round Table and so forth.
Scientists are doing tests and they have confirmed that King Arthur may have existed even though there is no such thing as Camelot.It is still debated whether or not he was real. It is for certain that most, (If not all) of English literature that describes him is false. But there may have been a real King Arthur. And we know that his supposed sucessor, Constantine the Third, was real. Meaning we know that Constantine was a king of Britain, but whether or not he followed Arthur is unknown.not ever person thinks so ,but he might be.people say he is coming to life and is trying to stop moredred.
He was real but was mostly myths and fairytale.
Historians have not been able to prove that King Arthur was a real person. Though there have been many tales about the famous king, his name wasn't mentioned in writing for several hundred years after he was said to have lived.
yes and no; some versions of the story tell Mordred as King Arthur's son.
Yes, he was married to the beautiful Guinevere.
Camelot is the court of King Arthur..... It's mythical . Yes it was. King Arthur was real and camelot was real, but all of the supposed magical adventures of Arthur and the kingdom of camelot weren't.
yes
Scientists are doing tests and they have confirmed that King Arthur may have existed even though there is no such thing as Camelot.It is still debated whether or not he was real. It is for certain that most, (If not all) of English literature that describes him is false. But there may have been a real King Arthur. And we know that his supposed sucessor, Constantine the Third, was real. Meaning we know that Constantine was a king of Britain, but whether or not he followed Arthur is unknown.not ever person thinks so ,but he might be.people say he is coming to life and is trying to stop moredred.
Well, it's a fact that King Arthur was an actual person, however, his power might have been exaggerated. But yes, the King of England did meet King Arthur.
Yes, King Solomon was thought to of been a real person. David and Bathsheba were his parents.
He was real but was mostly myths and fairytale.
they didn't have glasses back then. mid 1800's they were made yes glass was mid 16-1700's but glasses are far more different, trust me. But keep in mind that nobody knows if King Arthur was a real person or not. Theres no real true proof.
Historians have not been able to prove that King Arthur was a real person. Though there have been many tales about the famous king, his name wasn't mentioned in writing for several hundred years after he was said to have lived.
Yes, he was the king of England and then there's king geogre the second and the third
Yes, as king, I'm certain Arthur would have had gold.
Lancelot wasn't real and comes from the same fable as Arthur.
yes sir king arthur did die in avalon