answersLogoWhite

0

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What are som advantages and disadvantages of a mercator projection and of an equal area projection?

advantages: correctly shows the relative sizes of Earth's landmasses disadvantages: has distortion shows the landmasses near the edges stretched and curved


In mapping what is the difference between mercator projection and an equal area projection?

Mercator projection distorts the size of land masses, resulting in high distortion near the poles. Equal area projections maintain accurate land area proportions, making them useful for representing data like population density.


What is the difference between winkel tripel projection and mercator?

The Winkel Tripel projection is an equal-area map projection that reduces distortion compared to the Mercator projection, which is a conformal projection that preserves shapes but distorts sizes, particularly near the poles. The Winkel Tripel projection balances both shape and size distortions, making it more visually appealing for displaying global data, while the Mercator projection is often used for navigation due to its straight rhumb lines.


What is the most used projection map?

Discounting the Mercator, which cartographers tend to HATE but is ubiquitous anyway... Probably the Lambert Conformal Conic projection, or the Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection (used by the US National Atlas).


What one characteristic of the mercator projection remains true or undistorted no matter where you are on a map of this type?

The Mercator Projection keeps all angles of land masses equal in relation to the Earth's meridians. This is what has made it so popular as a nautical travel tool for sailors.


Is Greenland bigger than India?

No!, the picture below shows Greenland bigger than India. But this projection is wrong because its a Mercator Projection:- Mercator projection: The maps we see and use in schools are based on Mercator projection. A Mercator projection is a mathematical method of showing a map of the globe on a flat surface. This projection was developed in 1568 byGerhardus Mercator a Flemish geographer, mathematician, and cartographer.Mercator projection was made during an age when Europe dominated and exploited the world. The white dominated countries are thus portrayed to be extraordinarily large, while non white countries become extraordinarily small. It seems that the Mercator map was made to artificially portray the territorial "superiority" of the colonial powers, and psychologically impact the gullible minds of the colonised into submission. Surprisingly, even today maps in India reflect that bygone era.The United Nations in 1974, acknowledging this discrepancy (in Mercator maps), accepted a new map made by another German, Arno Peters. It is called the Peters' projection or the Peters' map. It has equal areas, and equal representation. Peters' map shows countries in their relative sizes, and is based upon Peters' decimal grid, which divides the surface of the Earth into a hundred longitudinal fields of equal width, and a hundred latitudinal fields of equal height.Really,This is correct


How are the Mercator projection and the Goode's projection different?

The difference between Mercator's and Peter's projection is that Mercator's projection blew up the size of powerful nations as size = power, in addition to this Mercator's projection allowed cartographers to produce charts from which sailors could navigate because his projection preserved shape and direction. IN contrast Peter did not really care about navigation, but rather restoring weaker, less powerful nations to their rightful size. The only problem with this was that sailors couldn't use Peter's projection for navigation, and his projection bought up a lot of controversy between educational and religious borders - some schools used Mercator's and some schools used Peter's/ some nations rejected peters projection and some nations accepted Peter's projection, etc.


What is the common flaw for both the Robinson and Mercator projections of maps?

Both Robinson and Mercator projection have severe distortion close to the poles. The Robinson projection is neither equal-area nor conformal. The Mercator projection is conformal in that it preserves angles, however, it distorts the size and shape of large objects, as the scale increases from the Equator to the poles, where it becomes infinite.


What were the advantages and disadvantages of apartheid?

everyone was not equal


How is distance measured in the mercator chart?

Distance on a Mercator chart is measured using the latitude scale, where each degree of latitude is equal to a specific distance in nautical miles. However, it's important to note that the Mercator projection distorts distances as you move towards the poles, elongating areas nearer the poles.


If the continents were drawn using a Mercator projection are the chances improved of finding a fit?

It's the location. 'A projection is a system for mapping the round Earth on a flat surface. The Mercator projection map shows the accurate locations of the continents and oceans. The land and water areas, however, are greatly distorted toward the North and South Poles.'


Describe patterns of meridians on the Mercator?

Meridians on the Mercator projection are straight lines that run from the North Pole to the South Pole at equal intervals, spaced evenly along the equator. As they approach the poles, the spacing between meridians shrinks, causing distortion in size, shape, and distance of land masses near the poles. This distortion is a common characteristic of the Mercator projection, which makes it ideal for navigation but less suitable for accurately representing areas and distances at high latitudes.