Remember that the story of King Arthur pulling Excalibur from the stone is a legend, not a historical event, so it doesn't have an actual date. But according to legend, it would have been sometime in the 5th century. That's not very specific, but unless you would like me to just make up a date, that will have to do.
King Arthur is usually reckoned to have died, or been fatally wounded, at the battle of Camlann - which is provisionally dated to 537 AD.
1883 was the date the Pendleton Act was signed by President Arthur.
The legendary King Arthur and the knight of the round table were fictional characters which may have been based on real person, possibly from the 5th or 6th century AD.The earliest reference seems to be the poem 'Historia Brittonum' originating from Wales in 800 AD. From that point and through the 11th century poems an troubadour songs appear extolling the virtues of Arthur.
August 28, 1968
Arthur was the 21st US President. He was a republican.21.
We Dont Now Really Its a MYTHHH
December 21st king Arthur was born in the 4th to the 5th century
wikipedia is a great resource site
Arthur's sword, symbol of divine kingship, is as much a character in the legend as any human or supernatural being. Excalibur is a symbol of the responsibility of power. In Tennyson's Idylls of the King, one side of Arthur's sword is engraved " in the oldest tongue of all this world,/ 'Take me, but turn the blade and ye shall see,/And written in the speech ye speak yourself,/'Cast me away!'" Tennyson describes Arthur's face as sad as he receives the sword, though Merlin counsels, "'Take thou and strike! the time to cast away/Is yet far-off.'" From the very words etched on the sword, we immediately see the cyclical nature of kingship. "Take me" becomes a call-to-arms for Arthur. By grasping the sword, Arthur accepts responsibility that leadership entails, his sadness an acknowledgement that his power will inevitably wane. According to legend, Arthur also possessed a lance, Ron, and a shield, Pridwen, on the back of which was painted a portrait of the Virgin Mary. The origins of the sword date back to Celtic mythology, but are found in British, Welsh, and Irish epics. The Welsh name for the sword was Caledvwlch. Irish stories call it Caladbolg, the fairy sword of the hero Cuchulain. In various British Arthur stories, Excalibur is often referred to as "Caliburn." Loomis comments the "ex-" or "es-" prefix that was later added was a "peculiar tendency" of the time period (424). There are two explanations of the way in which Arthur acquires Excalibur. Contemporary story-tellers are fond of "the sword in the stone" narrative in which young Arthur pulls the magical sword from a rock and anvil bearing this inscription: "Whoso pulleth out this sword of this stone and anvil is likewise King of all England." This is, for example, the main dramatic action in Disney's Sword in the Stone. Arthur's ability to pull the sword from the stone proves his worthiness as King. A second version describes Arthur and Merlin riding to a lake. Here they "see an arm clothed in white samite, rising from the water and holding a sword. Presently a damsel rides rapidly toward them, and at Merlin's bidding dismounts and walks with dry feet over the water. She takes the sword, the arm vanishes,and the damsel brings the coveted weapon back to Arthur. " Here we see the commingling of Christian and pagan motifs, the Christ-like walking on water with the fairy quality of Excalibur and the mythic making of a King. This version of the story is spoofed in Monty Python and the Holy Grail (1975) when the peasant Dennis, working on a Marxist commune, meets King Arthur. His companion, a warty old woman, asks Arthur how he came to be king, and Arthur, looking skyward, says he received kingship through the supernatural sanction of "the Lady of the Lake, her arm clad in shining samite" who lifted Excalibur "aloft from the bosom of the lake" to bestow it upon him, this description setting up Dennis's rejoinder: "Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. You can't expect to wield supreme power just because some watery tart threw a sword at you!"
The legend of King Arthur is a mythological tale, so the idea of his return is not based on historical fact. There is no specific date or event associated with his prophecy.
Historians don't even know when king arthur really live, if he was a real person or anything specifics about his history. So its impossible to tell you when he went to war
Because this was the date King Arthur and the Knights of the Round table were brutally murdered
King Arthur is usually reckoned to have died, or been fatally wounded, at the battle of Camlann - which is provisionally dated to 537 AD.
King Arthur is a legendary British figure, and his marriage to Queen Guinevere is part of Arthurian legend. The story states that they were married in Camelot, a mythical castle, though there is no historical evidence to pinpoint an exact date or location for the marriage.
Some time in the mid to late fifth century. If the historical basis for the Arthur legend is the British leader Riothomus, then his dates are probably about 455 to 470.
The common belief is that King Arthur was born in Tintagel Castle which is in the southwest corner of England. However, the castle was built in the 12th century for some an earl at that time and Arthur lived around the 5th and 6th centuries. However, there are ruins of a stronghold near Tintagel Castle which date from Arthur's time period.
Remember that King Arthur is a legend (fictional, although his character and depiction may be based on a factual person); in legend Arthur died in the battle of Camlam. Mordred either fatally wounded him or killed him and he was buried at Avalon,Arthur's historical existence is the 10th-century Annales Cambriae, which also link Arthur with the Battle of Mount Badon. The Annales date this battle to 516--518, and also mention the Battle of Camlann, in which Arthur andMedraut (Mordred) were both killed, dated to 537--539.During the Battle of Camlann (est. 537), King Arthur impaled his half-brother Mordred with a lance. Mordred though used what little remained of his strength to pull King Arthur to him, and delivered a fatal blow with his sword. He supposedly died later from those wounds.