After Okonkwo's exile:Obierika thought it did not make sense to punish a man for an accident. Also, he thought about twins his wife had borne who were killed and thrown away. However, he also thought that if punishment was not exacted for an offense, it would bring a stain to the clan.
Eg, one possible example is that people might get away with crimes by pretending that they were accidents, and not getting punished.
After Abame's slaughter:
He thought that a great evil had come upon Mbanta and their land, also affecting their sacred lake and its fish. He also thought the village of Mbanta had paid for their foolishness. He further thought that the stories of the white men had not been true, but they must be now.
After Nwoye arrives in Umuofia after having left his family:
Obierika wonders what has happened between Nwoye and Okonkwo.
After the white men begin encroaching on the tribal lands:
Obierika thinks it is too late to fight against the white men as they have already recruited other clansmen to their side. To fight the white men would be to fight clansman, which would be unthinkable.
After Okonwko and the men are set free from their imprisonment:
Obierika thinks his friend has been badly mistreated and must eat to regain his strength.
After Okonkwo hangs himself:
Obierika thinks that the white men drove Okonwko to kill himself. Obierika is besides himself with grief.
They were to enable the white man to see and talk to spirits.
Some people do think the book is racist. Others feel it develops understandings between cultures and serves to defeat racism.
the Africans think the whites have no toes because they wear shoes which make their toes not visible
What I think about subculture is that it is apart of our lives so that makes it a way of life.
Important questions you can ask about the narrator and tone in Things Fall Apart by Chinua Achebe to think about Achebe's beliefs perspectives and assumptions, or to review any other book or story include:Who is the narrator?What are the narrator/author's beliefs, perspectives, and assumptions? Do these seem authentic? Justifiable given the narrator/author's story?Why did the narrator/author choose the particular voice used primarily in the story?How would you describe the tone?What is the narrator/author purpose in using that specific tone?Does the tone change; if so, where in the story does it change and why?How does the tone enhance the story being told?
climbing up a tree and braking these things apart................................................................. i think
climbing up a tree and braking these things apart................................................................. i think
Tale not specified.
Chinua Achebe - "Things Fall Apart"
yup i think there is difference in disaster and calamity. Technically. Yes. If you analyze the roots, you will most likely find a nuanced difference. Today though, such difference is essentially no existent.
They were to enable the white man to see and talk to spirits.
AI has not been invented.
Some people do think the book is racist. Others feel it develops understandings between cultures and serves to defeat racism.
That depends completely on how it is managed. It is a calamity if it is ignored. Managed well, and minimized to the greatest degree possible (we cannot stop climate change from happening), it could be the best opportunity ever. Think research, new sources of energy and new ways to think about energy use, respect for the earth, "carbon trading", etc.
yes think of A in anaphase and A in apart and you will remember
i think SSS doesn't have a calamity loan but they do have a SLERP (Salary Loan Early Renewal Program) where it is a type of an emergency loan where your present balance will be deducted to your new loan. but this is case to case basis. only if the Government declares a state of calamity on your area
Well...if you're a guy....