Want this question answered?
The value of Leland Brewsaugh metal etching can widely vary. The condition of the item is a big factor. Approximate values are 50 cents a pound if it's nickel plated.
It depends on the size, type (acrylic or watercolor) and the detail of the piece but as a ballpark answer $350 for a small (pocket book or slightly larger) to Thousands for larger (and generally more detailed than you'll ever be able to see in one sitting). His works pull you in to the work and fill you with such emotion that they are difficult to look away from or walk away.
The main difference is that acrylic is water based and enamel is oil based. You can almost always tell the base of a paint by looking at the 'cleanup and thinning ' instructions. Oil based enamels are indeed oil based, however, there are many water based enamels on the market. Enamel designates that the surface is hard.
how much are nancy bailys paintings worth are they worth anything
most are worth 175 dollars but some are worth over 6000 dollars!
The value of Leland Brewsaugh metal etching can widely vary. The condition of the item is a big factor. Approximate values are 50 cents a pound if it's nickel plated.
2 billion back then in 1850
2 billion back then in 1850
Shonberg never painted in acrylic, only Casein. This means that original acrylics do not exist, and therefore have no value.
I have a Masonite 3 ft. tall Bozo with bowling ball, it has the Larry Harmon logo on the back, purchased in late 60's
its worth $5
Leland never did pictures on wood or Masonite and rarely canvas. He painted on matte board that had been treated with Geso. However all his wildlife carvings were painted bass wood. What you are inquiring about might be a print decoupaged onto a piece of wood-which were never done by my father, Leland. People could buy his mass marketed prints and decoupage them. They are worth whatever someone will pay for them. I've never seen a decoupaged item sell for more than $-15-30. They were popular in the 70s and 80s. Decoupaged pieces don't hold up very well. I receive many questions about prints. My father did 8 songbirds, 4 owls, 8 ducks, 4 parrots and 4 eagles that were printed internationally. They came in a variety of sizes. If you have one of these birds and it only has 1 signature it is Not signed by my father. That is a printed signature. When he signed a print, typically it was in pencil below the printed signature. If it was a limited edition it would be numbered. The only place to purchase a signed or limited edition was directly from my Father. Sadly the color in these prints did not hold up well. It's not uncommon to see fading especially if it was hung in a sunny area. NOTE: if you like any picture or print you have don't hang it in an area of the house that gets direct sunlight. The last prints my Father produced with a printer. In other words they weren't mass marketed. The birds are an egret (white bird), blue heron (blue) and an eagle. He did several other very small editions as well. So What is it Worth? I like to deflect by answering it is worth what someone will pay for it. Fact is the mass marketed prints signed or unsigned are not worth much. $1-40. As for the eagle, the blue heron and the egret-well I'm selling them on eBay for $30-45 as of July 8, 2013. If you need information on a painting or a wood carving feel free to contact me, his daughter directly. Bruzabooks@gmail.com
I would say if the kit is in good condition and is original, you should be able to get $2500 to $3000 for it. I own an acrylic black kit and a clear blue kit. Visatlites.
AnswerI do not know the difference in Image vs. Acrylic. BUT, I was told by two different dental clinics that the Image dentures are the better of the two.Also, at a dental clinic in North Carolina the price is $270.00 more for the Acrylic full set ($885 vs. $615) . In South Carolina, the price is only $100.00 more for the Acrylic full set ($495 vs. $395).So, a logical answer to the "...are they worth the money" question is, it depend on the amount of the difference!More inputImage is a brand name of the high end acrylic teeth from Lincoln Dental. Generally high end acrylic teeth last longer than economy teeth. You may want to check out the companies claims of longevity.A high end denture made with quality materials and processed with conventional techniques is prefered over economy teeth with a quick cure processed denture.An example of high end acrylic teeth would be the already mentioned Image teeth by Lincoln Dental, Physoden by Vita, portrait by Dentsply, Ivoclar Blue Line by Williams Ivoclar. Processing techniques would be either an Injected Denture or a Packed Denture processed in conventional water bath for 9 hours at 73c. Or the alternative process of 90 minutes at 73c with a 30 minute boil. Anything less usually dramatically decreases the quality of the finished denture. There are faster techniques for processing a finished denture but the quality of the finished product will go down exponentially with the speed of the processing.
Actually you can contact Leland Chapman, after all he works with his father "Dog The Bounty Hunter" And the e-mail address for them is "dakinebailbonds@msn.com and I also have a snail mail address for them as well as a phone number and the number is (808) 921-2245
You should never use any over the counter cleaner because many contain ammonia which can cause clouding on your acrylic or premature aging. Only use a pH nuetralizing disinfectant and be sure to mix it according to the directions. The best selling tanning bed cleaner is Australian Gold's pH Nuetralizing Disinfectant. A 32 oz bottle will dilute to get you 16 gallons of the cleaner and it runs around just $11 a bottle. Well worth it especially when you consider the cost of replacing an acrylic.
http://www.stanford.edu/home/stanford/history/begin.html You may have heard a story that a lady in "faded gingham" (Jane Stanford) and a man dressed in a "homespun threadbare suit" (Leland Stanford) went to visit the president of Harvard, were rebuffed, and as a result, went on to found their own university in Palo Alto. This untrue story is an urban myth, and Stanford's archivist has prepared a response for those desiring more information: For what it is worth, there was a book written by the then Harvard president's son that may have started the twist on actual events. Leland Stanford Junior was just short of his 16th birthday when he died of typhoid fever in Florence, Italy on March 13, 1884. He had not spent a year at Harvard before his death, nor was he "accidentally killed." Following Leland Junior's death, the Stanfords determined to found an institution in his name that would serve the "children of California." Detained on the East Coast following their return from Europe, the Stanfords visited a number of universities and consulted with the presidents of each. The account of their visit with Charles W. Eliot at Harvard is actually recounted by Eliot himself in a letter sent to David Starr Jordan (Stanford's first president) in 1919. At the point the Stanfords met with Eliot, they apparently had not yet decided about whether to establish a university, a technical school or a museum. Eliot recommended a university and told them the endowment should be $5 million. Accepted accounts indicate that Jane and Leland looked at each other and agreed they could manage that amount. The thought of Leland and Jane, by this time quite wealthy, arriving at Harvard in a faded gingham dress and homespun threadbare suit is quite entertaining. And, as a former governor of California and well-known railroad baron, they likely were not knowingly kept waiting for too long outside Eliot's office. The Stanfords also visited Cornell, MIT and Johns Hopkins. The Stanfords established two institutions in Leland Junior's name -- the University and the Museum, which was originally planned for San Francisco, but moved to adjoin the university.