4 mp of course
Not by today's standards, where 14mp is the norm. It is, however sufficient for most applications - it'll fill the screen on your confuser.
No, high resolution isn't always better for several reasons. Sensor size is very important- if a manufacturer puts lots of pixels on a small sensor images are susceptible to digital noise that when processed out can cause noticeable smoothing of edges and loss of detail; the bigger the pixels in theory the less noise and better image quality. The 100% crops of an image taken from a high resolution camera will be more noisy than a lower resolution on the same sized sensor. But if zoomed out to show the same amount of picture as the lower resolution picture 100% crop more detail will be shown on the higher resolution picture. a comparison of the 16MP D4 and 36.2MP D800 by digital rev goes over this. In terms of compacts the better quality will be achieved by the lower resolution camera (in RAW). This is highlighted with the lumix cameras with low end models have a higher resolution than the model above them. For example the LX7 a top end compact has only 10MP were as the sz1 has 16 or the Fz45 had a 14MP res then was superseded by the 12MP fz48- to achive higher picture quality. Having said all that new technology such as Nokia's pure view tech does a great job of noise management and cancellation in the 8mp jpegs. But generally the bigger the sensor the better image quality from the same resolution.
I use Case Logic for my camera and I love it! It's harder than the average case which provides more protection. I also like it because if you don't feel like holding it, it has a clip on the back so you can attatch it to your belt/belt loop. And if you don't want to do that, you can clip on the long neck strap, and wear it sort of like a necklace. Hope my info was helpful! -fastpitch_girl
Capacity 3.0 MP 5.0 MP 8.0 MP 10 MP 12 MP16MB 10 9 5 2 232MB 25 17 10 5 4128MB 150 120 80 55 32256MB 300 240 160 110 71512MB 600 480 320 225 1211GB 1200 950 600 400 2602GB 2400 1900 1200 800 5004GB* 4000 3000 2000 1500 1000 Capacity 3.0 MP 5.0 MP 8.0 MP 10 MP 12 MP16MB 10 9 5 2 232MB 25 17 10 5 4128MB 150 120 80 55 32256MB 300 240 160 110 71512MB 600 480 320 225 1211GB 1200 950 600 400 2602GB 2400 1900 1200 800 5004GB* 4000 3000 2000 1500 1000
the 14mp camera has 1.4 times better quality than the 10mp one
around 200
Assuming a standard JPEG format, a 32GB card can store approx. 6539 14MP photos.
No, you don't. It is a very cool camera because you can use regular AA batteries.
You can't charge it...it works off 2 AA batteries
Not by today's standards, where 14mp is the norm. It is, however sufficient for most applications - it'll fill the screen on your confuser.
This all depends on what type of camera you have. If you have a point and shoot (which has a very small sensor), you typically won't see a difference between a low MP number (like 6MP) and a high MP number (like 14MP) because of the optics and the physical limitations of a small sensor, and believe it or not, a higher MP number can actually reduce the quality of the image by making it grainier. If you have a Digital SLR, however, you will notice the difference between 6MP and 14MP because DSLRs have large sensors and capture more information. So, for a point and shoot, I would advise no more than 10-12MP and for a DSLR no more than 17MP.
no
AnswerTo find out how many photos a 2Gb card will take, if you have one, your User Guide/Instruction Book/ on-screen Manual should be able to help you. It depends on the size of the photos taken.For example, I have a Canon A710IS which is 7Mp, and under "Memory Cards and Estimated Capacities" for a 512 SD memory cardit it goes from 156 for 'Large (3072x2304 pixels)' to 839 for 'Postcard (1600 x 1200 pixels)'. If you don't have a Manual, for a 2G card and 14Mp camera double those numbers and subtract 1/7th and you won't be far wrong.
Some of the best features of Kodak Easyshare Digital Cameras are the high megapixel rating across the range with many 12 and 14mp cameras available. The other primary feature of these cameras is the Easyshare function itself which allows 3-step sharing of your pictures with friends, family or the world.
No, high resolution isn't always better for several reasons. Sensor size is very important- if a manufacturer puts lots of pixels on a small sensor images are susceptible to digital noise that when processed out can cause noticeable smoothing of edges and loss of detail; the bigger the pixels in theory the less noise and better image quality. The 100% crops of an image taken from a high resolution camera will be more noisy than a lower resolution on the same sized sensor. But if zoomed out to show the same amount of picture as the lower resolution picture 100% crop more detail will be shown on the higher resolution picture. a comparison of the 16MP D4 and 36.2MP D800 by digital rev goes over this. In terms of compacts the better quality will be achieved by the lower resolution camera (in RAW). This is highlighted with the lumix cameras with low end models have a higher resolution than the model above them. For example the LX7 a top end compact has only 10MP were as the sz1 has 16 or the Fz45 had a 14MP res then was superseded by the 12MP fz48- to achive higher picture quality. Having said all that new technology such as Nokia's pure view tech does a great job of noise management and cancellation in the 8mp jpegs. But generally the bigger the sensor the better image quality from the same resolution.
I use Case Logic for my camera and I love it! It's harder than the average case which provides more protection. I also like it because if you don't feel like holding it, it has a clip on the back so you can attatch it to your belt/belt loop. And if you don't want to do that, you can clip on the long neck strap, and wear it sort of like a necklace. Hope my info was helpful! -fastpitch_girl