To allow the government to enact and enforce laws
The Articles of Confederation did not create the executive or judicial branches.
The intent of the framers of the Articles of Confederation was to create a small government. The framers also sought to create a cohesive Constitution.
No. One of the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation was that it made no provision for a federal court system. Article III of the US Constitution, which replaced the Articles of Confederation, required that Congress establish the Supreme Court. In other words, the Constitution said the government had to have a supreme court, but didn't directly create one. It left that task to Congress.
No. After the Brittish strong authority, the Articles of Confederation were designed to have a weak federal (national) government, with strong state governments. In fact, the federal government had no power of compulsion over the states: states could choose not to follow federal law
A strong federal government. People were scared that this would end up bringing them back under a rule similar to England.
to create a stonger central government because the Articles of Confederation were too weak.
The Articles of Confederation did not create the executive or judicial branches.
National JudiciaryArticles: Maritime judiciary establishedConstitution: Federal judiciary established, including Supreme Court
The writers of the Declaration of Independence the articles of confederation and The constitution all used quill pens to create these famous documents
States had more power. They did not want the federal government to have too much power like Britain/Parliament. What couldn't Congress do under the Articles of Confederation? Congress couldn't regulate trade or collect taxes.
discuss revising the Article of Confederation. (APEX)
The intent of the framers of the Articles of Confederation was to create a small government. The framers also sought to create a cohesive Constitution.
No. One of the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation was that it made no provision for a federal court system. Article III of the US Constitution, which replaced the Articles of Confederation, required that Congress establish the Supreme Court. In other words, the Constitution said the government had to have a supreme court, but didn't directly create one. It left that task to Congress.
The states tried to retain control for themselves by leaving the central government practically powerless, but this caused problems between states. That is why the Articles of Confederation were abandoned and the Constitutional Convention called to create a more powerful federal government that balanced the authority of the states.
po
No. After the Brittish strong authority, the Articles of Confederation were designed to have a weak federal (national) government, with strong state governments. In fact, the federal government had no power of compulsion over the states: states could choose not to follow federal law
popular sovereignty