That really depends on the religion.
If the animals are being treated well and are not being harmed than I do not believe most religions would have a response. Animals have been used for work and entertainment for the entire history of mankind and the biggest moral outcry is typically that they be treated well and not deliberately harmed during the process.
However a few religions do not allow animals to be used for anything at all, but these are comparably rare.
I don't believe there is but if I would take a mad guess at it, I would say that it would probably be "Ent." but that's only a guess...
They would often huddle around and tell spoooky stories.
They went to public places: the baths, the forum to socialise and have fun.Of course there were amphitheatres which put on performances: theatre and combats and theatres which put on plays and musical 'concerts'. They could have fun by any means playing games, dancing and especially during festivals and public celebrations.bad
Picture a world with no movies, poetry and songs and a world without joy. Would it be normal?
As William Blake was born in 1757, i doubt they had entertainment. However, to keep himself occupied he would probably write one of his famous poems or paintings.. Really hope this helps!
A religious believer might treat animals in a way that they believe their god would. This might include respect or sacrifices.
Religious people believe that God made the world and the animals so therefore eating it would be ruining the earth.
An ancient amphitheater was a gathering place for entertainment or religious rites. Various activities from pageants, the ending of parades, public executions and gladiatorial contests were held in one.
It could be argued that the Christian religion would arguably not disapprove of animals in the circus. The Bible states that man is given dominion over animals.
It is hundreds of millions of years old. Prehistoric animals would have had the "fight or flight" response when confronted by a predator. Since dinosaurs roamed the earth from about 235 million years ago until 65 million years ago, this response would have been present in these creatures, as well.
It's Walter Bradford's that animals have one of two responses when posed with a threat: fight or flight. Technically its a stress response or nerve response. In humans, the response can be either aggressiveness or physicality is fighting and deflection, running or hiding would be flight
It would be much different then the entertainment here. The opposite you could say.
Entertainment was Inquisition. They would get out of there, convert to christianity, or be put to death. Villagers would watch someone being murdered at the marketplace as entertainment.
The Circus Maximus was used for chariot racing and some religious ceremonies and pageants were performed there. The Colosseum was for any other type of entertainment, gladiatrorial fights, public executions, animal hunts, etc.
This is likely the word "extinct", which is applied to past species of organisms that have died out. Another possible word would be "instinct" (an automatic response, as in animals).
You can respond any way you wish. Most religious individuals would say something to the affect of "And with you, too." Others might simply say thank you.
If you are religious, then God created them. If not, the answer is pretty much unknown, although animals as we see them today are decended from others, so they were created through evolution.