0
What else can I help you with?
In the case of a tenancy where the landlord claims that the tenant has not paid and the tenant insists that he has- on whom does the burden of proof rest?
The burden is on the tenant to prove that they paid.
What is the burden of proof needed for in an arrest?
It is not known as "The Burden of Proof" it is known as "PROBABLE CAUSE." Probable cause is a standard used in justifying certain police actions. For example, police need to have probable cause to believe that evidence of a crime exists. It is more than mere suspicion but less than the amount of evidence required for conviction. (e.g.- A police officer may have probable cause to believe that there is the possibility of criminal activity when someone is encountered trespassing on private property late at night wearing a stocking mask, in order to justify stopping and searching the person for possession of criminal tools.) See:http://definitions.uslegal.com/p/probable-cause/
How can the stereotype that girls are a burden on their parents affect the life of a daughter?
They could become sad or angry. If they're smart and their parents don't treat them like a burden, they'll ignore it.
How do Social Democrats view Affirmative Action?
Well.... they believe in it. They sure do. Now on the other hand.... Republicans don't believe in it.
What is the nickname for the Department of Defense?
The Department of Defense is often referred to as The DOD.
7 Who has the burden of proof with an affirmative defense?
The burden of proof for an affirmative defense is the responsibility of the defense.
What are lack of proof defenses?
Lack of Proof Defenses are: 1. Not enough Burden of Proof (beyond a reasonable doubt to convict someone) 2. Some affirmative defense used by the defense a. an affirmative defense is: new facts by the defense must be prove and they can also use other alibis to help them with their case (witness could say that they were intoxicated, insanity and other statutory defenses)
What is the difference between an affirmative defense and a denial?
A denial does just that it denies the Plaintiff's allegations and the burden of proof is still on the Plaintiff to prove the prima facie case.An affirmative defense does not deny the allegations but asserts a defense that would negate the legal effect of the Plaintiff's cause of action. The burden of proof in an affirmative defense is on the Defendant.An example would be a breach of contract case. The Plaintiff claims that he had a contract with the Defendant, and Defendant did not perform the contract. A denial would say "We never had a contract" and the Plaintiff would have to prove the existence of a contract. An affirmative defense would say "Yes, we had a contract, but that was 20 years ago thus the action is barred by the 10 year statute of limitations." Then the burden of proof is on the Defendant to show that the contract falls outside of the statute of limitations period.
What is the role of an affirmative defense in civil cases?
An affirmative defense in civil cases is a legal argument raised by the defendant to counter or justify their actions. It shifts the burden of proof to the defendant to prove their defense, rather than the plaintiff having to prove their case. This defense can help the defendant avoid liability or reduce the damages awarded in a civil case.
What is an affirmative defense in a civil case and how does it impact the outcome of the legal proceedings?
An affirmative defense in a civil case is when the defendant presents new facts or arguments to counter the plaintiff's claims. It can impact the outcome by shifting the burden of proof to the defendant and potentially leading to a dismissal or reduction of damages if successful.
What is an affirmative defense and how can it be used in a legal case?
An affirmative defense is a legal argument used by a defendant to counter or justify the claims made by the plaintiff. It is a proactive assertion of facts that, if proven, can excuse or justify the defendant's actions. Affirmative defenses can be used in a legal case to shift the burden of proof onto the plaintiff or to show that the defendant should not be held liable for the alleged wrongdoing.
Who has the burden of proof in an insanity defense?
In an insanity defense, the defense must prove that the defendant is insane.
Did burden of proof on the issue of causation rests on the prosecution?
No. The prosecution only has to prove that you COMMITTED the offense. The issue of WHY (the cause) you did it is not a prosecutorial responsibility.
What changed in the practice of Law that shifted the burden of proof of insanity to the defendant?
the Federal Insanity Defense Reform Act
To what extent should the burden of proof be task upon the affirmative to prove?
I don't want to guess at what is being asked. Please re-word the question and re-submit
What is the highest burden of proof?
The burden of proof is on the prosecutor. They must prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused is guilty. The defense only needs to raise reasonable doubt about the defendant's guilt. If jurors believe the defendant may have committed the crime, but have reasonable doubt then they must find the defendant not guilty.
When was The Burden of Proof created?
The Burden of Proof was created in 1990.
