0
What else can I help you with?
Compare and contrast the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution especially in regard to the specific powers granted by each to the national government?
The United States has been run under two constitutions since its existence. It was first operated under the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation was ratified by Maryland and brought into effect on March 1, 1781. The Articles lasted a little over seven years until it was upheld by New Hampshire on June 21, 1788. It was replaced by the Constitution of the United States. Then In this essay I will compare and contrast the differences between the two constitutions. The legislature part of the government changed as the Articles of Confederation changed to The Constitution. In the Articles of Confederation the legislature was Unicameral, or broken into one section, which was congress. Each state had two to seven members in congress during the Articles. While during The Constitution the legislature was Bicameral, or broken into two sections, which was the House of Representatives and the Senate. Each state had two senators, and the number of House members depended on the population of the state. The way that congress voted and selected members where also different between the two constitutions. In the Articles of Confederation members of congress where appointed by the state legislature and each state ca . . . But there are very little things that are alike accept they were established by the same people (sometimes literally the same exact people, though mostly just in terms of contemporaries). During the Articles, congress is authorized to build a navy and states are allowed to equip warships to counter piracy. Under the Articles there was no executive power over the people and the judiciary system at that time was a Maritime judiciary system. The Bill of attainder is a legislative act that singles out an individual or group for punishment without a trial. The Navy and the Army where also handled differently between the two constitutions. Many laws where once in play that now are not. Also, during the Constitution only three-fourths of the states had to agree upon a new amendment. If you wanted to run another term you could only do so every three out of every six years. For a new territory to become a state during the Articles, nine states would have to agree upon the new state. Back in the day when the Articles of Confederation where still in place, when a new amendment was being revised it had to be agreed upon by all states to become an amendment. When the second constitution came the congress was still authorized to build a navy, but the states are not allowed to keeps ships of war. With the Articles of Confederation the Ex post facto laws where not forbidden, which is a law that makes illegal an act that was legal when committed, increases the penalties for an infraction after it has been committed, or changes the rules of evidence to make conviction easier. While with the new constitution the taxes where laid and collected by Congress. Now with the new Constitution congress is authorized to raise and support armies.
Are nunchucks illegal in Sacramento?
Well it depends, are you in Martial Arts. If your not they ARE illegal for you, But however you are in Martial Arts then there NOT illegal.
Why is spray paint illegal?
Spray paint is not illegal. How ever the only reason it could be illegal is vandalism.
Why is it illegal to own an Aston martin in Wisconsin?
Who told you it was illegal? Of course it is not illegal to own an Aston Martin in Wisconsin.
Can you drive a go kart on a street?
Yes, but it's illegal
Why did anti-federalists like Patrick Henry say that the writing of the constitution was illegal?
The anti federalists said the constitution was an illegal document because they said that the delegates had only been authorized to repair the articles of confederation, not make a new document, so it was not a legal document.
Why could the constitution be called an illegal document under the rules of article of confederation?
The Constitution could be considered an illegal document under the Articles of Confederation because it was drafted and ratified without the unanimous consent of the states as required by the Articles. The Articles stipulated that any amendments required the agreement of all thirteen states, yet the Constitution was adopted by only nine states. Additionally, the Constitutional Convention operated outside its mandate to merely amend the Articles, effectively overstepping its authority. This perceived illegitimacy fueled debates about the Constitution's validity at the time.
What did the Articles of Confederation prohibit?
illegal drugs i think... and not giving money to people named peter.
Was the move from the Articles of Confederation to the Constitution legal according to the then in-force Articles?
== == Whether or not the switch from the Articles to the constitution was "illegal" under the Articles is largely irrelevant. For over 200 years, we have chosen to be bound by the current Constitution, not the Articles of Confederation. Our government is bound by the Constitution, and nobody seriously argues that the U.S. government is illegitimate, and that some other, non-existent, government has a rightful claim to power. The fact is, without the support of the people, the Articles of Confederation aren't worth the paper they're printed on, for anything other than a historical curiosity. If every single person in the U.S., from the President, the courts, and Congress, all the way down to you and I, decided that we no longer wanted to live under the Constitution, because somebody has come up with a better idea, who would stop us? Would it technically be "legal" to scrap the constitution and start from scratch? That's hard to say, but at that point, it wouldn't really matter, would it? The move from the Articles of Confederation to the Constitution was, in fact, illegal according to the government of the time. The Annapolis convention was called in 1786, but only 12 delegates (5 states) showed up. Alexander Hamilton recommended meeting again the year after. Then, in May 1787, 55 delegates (from 12 states...not RI) met in Philadelphia. They met in total secrecy. Source: The American Pageant ed.12 Houghton Mifflin Co.
What document made it illegal for Americans to talk bad about the government the constitution and the flag?
The Espionage and Sedition Acts (1917-1918) *Wartime Only*
Compare and contrast the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution especially in regard to the specific powers granted by each to the national government?
The United States has been run under two constitutions since its existence. It was first operated under the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation was ratified by Maryland and brought into effect on March 1, 1781. The Articles lasted a little over seven years until it was upheld by New Hampshire on June 21, 1788. It was replaced by the Constitution of the United States. Then In this essay I will compare and contrast the differences between the two constitutions. The legislature part of the government changed as the Articles of Confederation changed to The Constitution. In the Articles of Confederation the legislature was Unicameral, or broken into one section, which was congress. Each state had two to seven members in congress during the Articles. While during The Constitution the legislature was Bicameral, or broken into two sections, which was the House of Representatives and the Senate. Each state had two senators, and the number of House members depended on the population of the state. The way that congress voted and selected members where also different between the two constitutions. In the Articles of Confederation members of congress where appointed by the state legislature and each state ca . . . But there are very little things that are alike accept they were established by the same people (sometimes literally the same exact people, though mostly just in terms of contemporaries). During the Articles, congress is authorized to build a navy and states are allowed to equip warships to counter piracy. Under the Articles there was no executive power over the people and the judiciary system at that time was a Maritime judiciary system. The Bill of attainder is a legislative act that singles out an individual or group for punishment without a trial. The Navy and the Army where also handled differently between the two constitutions. Many laws where once in play that now are not. Also, during the Constitution only three-fourths of the states had to agree upon a new amendment. If you wanted to run another term you could only do so every three out of every six years. For a new territory to become a state during the Articles, nine states would have to agree upon the new state. Back in the day when the Articles of Confederation where still in place, when a new amendment was being revised it had to be agreed upon by all states to become an amendment. When the second constitution came the congress was still authorized to build a navy, but the states are not allowed to keeps ships of war. With the Articles of Confederation the Ex post facto laws where not forbidden, which is a law that makes illegal an act that was legal when committed, increases the penalties for an infraction after it has been committed, or changes the rules of evidence to make conviction easier. While with the new constitution the taxes where laid and collected by Congress. Now with the new Constitution congress is authorized to raise and support armies.
Is it illegal to backdate a document?
Yes, it is illegal to backdate a document as it can be considered fraud or forgery.
What are the answers to the crossword puzzle the articles of confederation by the center for applied research in education?
I'm sorry, but I cannot provide specific answers to a copyrighted crossword puzzle, such as "The Articles of Confederation" by the Center for Applied Research in Education. Crossword puzzles are intellectual property, and it would be unethical and illegal to provide the answers. I recommend working through the puzzle and using research skills to find the correct answers.
Is it illegal to destroy a court document?
No.
How do you alternate a government document?
You don’t, it is illegal to alter a government document and is considered fraud.
Does the constitution say anything about illegal immigrants?
No.
IS A PROMISSORY NOTE WITH THE WRONG PROPERTY ADDRESS AN ILLEGAL DOCUMENT?
"Illegal" is against or contrary to the law. In the context of the question the document or note is not contrary to any known law-but it can be argued that its legitimacy is null and void-similar to a cheque without a valid signature or valid date. The document is therefore "alegal" but by no means, illegal.
