Because California has a transform boundary which is a source of earthquakes.
In Europe
Chicago is not on a fault line so there can't be earthquakes.
Earthquakes happen when the Earth's crust shifts violently. So if we know that an earthquake has happened in California, then scientist know that the crust under California is unstable, therefore making earthquakes more likely to happen there. Earthquakes can happen anywhere, but the tend to happen repeatedly in certain spots
San Francisco
most likely, yes Well - another earthquake can certainly happen - but - being linguistically precise and picky, another earthquake can't happen AGAIN because it has not happened yet. Not sure if this was the questioner's intent, but an interesting riddle none the less.
mostly likely
In Europe
yes because there in earthquake perimeter
It is likely that more earthquakes will happen in California in the future, as it is a seismically active region. However, it is impossible to predict exactly when or where they will occur. It's important for residents to be prepared and have a plan in place for earthquake safety.
Chicago is not on a fault line so there can't be earthquakes.
Earthquakes happen when the Earth's crust shifts violently. So if we know that an earthquake has happened in California, then scientist know that the crust under California is unstable, therefore making earthquakes more likely to happen there. Earthquakes can happen anywhere, but the tend to happen repeatedly in certain spots
California (most likely LA), but it was set in Chicago, Illinois.
California, Alaska and Japan are all locations that have frequent earthquakes.
San Francisco
The West Coast of the U.S. (California, Oregon, Washington)
If an earthquake strikes, such a street is likely to get destroyed.
San Francisco, California