answersLogoWhite

0

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What was the attitude of church leaders and the wealthy towards the art in the Renaissance?

They fangirled over One Direction


What was the attitude of church leaders and the wealthy towards the art?

The attitude of church leaders and the wealthy toward the arts was encouraging because they would spend a huge amount of money for the arts. They became patrons of the arts by financially supporting artists.


During the Renaissance what was the church leaders attitude towards wealthy and art people?

During the Renaissance, church leaders often had a complex relationship with wealthy patrons and artists. While they relied on affluent individuals for funding and support of religious art and architecture, there was also a concern about the potential for materialism to overshadow spiritual values. Many church leaders appreciated the beauty and educational value of art, using it to convey religious messages and enhance worship. However, some were wary of excess and the influence of wealth on moral and spiritual integrity.


What was the attitude of church leaders and the wealthy toward the art?

The attitude of church leaders and the wealthy toward the arts was encouraging because they would spend a huge amount of money for the arts. They became patrons of the arts by financially supporting artists.


What attitude of church leaders and the wealthy toward the arts?

The attitude of church leaders and the wealthy toward the arts was encouraging because they would spend a huge amount of money for the arts. They became patrons of the arts by financially supporting artists.


What were the differences between the middle ages and the renaissance in the attitude toward wealthy pleasures?

During the Middle Ages, material wealth and worldly pleasures were often viewed as distractions from spiritual life, and the pursuit of them was frowned upon by the Church. In contrast, the Renaissance saw a shift towards a more secular worldview where wealthy pleasures were embraced as a sign of success and power, leading to the flourishing of art, literature, and patronage among the wealthy elite.


In what ways were the wealthy Europeans of the Renaissance different from the wealthy Europeans of feudal times?

in what ways were the wealthy europeans of the renaissance differnent from the wealthy europeans of feudal times?


What was the attitude of the wealthy toward the poor in the 1920's?

In the 1920s, the attitude of the wealthy towards the poor was often characterized by a lack of empathy and understanding. Many wealthy individuals believed in the idea of social Darwinism, which suggested that the poor were responsible for their own situations and that helping them would impede personal progress. This attitude contributed to a lack of support for social welfare programs and exacerbated the challenges faced by the poor during that time.


In what ways were the wealthy Europeans of the renaissance diffrent from the wealthy Europeans of feudal times?

ghgjhhjkjkhjhkhj


The patrons of the renaissance were mostly?

Churches and wealthy merchants.


How were the wealthy Europeans of the renaissance different from the wealthy Europeans of feudal times?

well it depends if you know itidk


Was Florence the main part of the Renaissance?

It was the birthplace of the Renaissance and the home of wealthy sponsors for artists like Michangelo.