Yes, he was one of the "wild beasts", but much more unknown. In a Ft. Lauderdale museum I examined his simplistic small landscapes and then turned the corner to see his magnificent nudes that appeared to be made with another hand. This man was a true artist capable of painting any style. Call him what you will but he was considered a fauvist.
-explosive colors and impulsive brushwork -color/art generates its own artistic energy - sketchy brushwork, and wildly arbitrary colors create a harsh and dissonant effect -some have themes of modern urban alienation
France
2020
italian
He certainly is. But like many artists he changed his style after the fauvist period.
FAUVIST.
lono kala
Yes
It started with an exhibition in Paris in 1905.
It comes from French 'fauvre', meaning wild beast. It refers to the violent colours created by some French artists prominent in 1905 - such as Matisse and Derain
Henri Matisse
Click link below to see some fauvist paintings!
a fauvist or an expressionist.
Raoul Dufy
He called this Synthetism. Gauguin was a prominent impressionist/fauvist artist.
Fauviste is the French equivalent of the English word "fauvist."Specifically, the word functions as a feminine/masculine noun in its singular form. It includes among its renderings into English "adherent to the style of fauvism." It originates in the word fauve for "wild beast."The pronunciation will be "fo-veest" in French.