When visiting a terminally ill person, it is always correct to act the same as if the person was not terminally ill. Be genuine. Don't ignore the "elephant in the living room", meaning, the "big thing" that nobody wants to mention. But also, don't focus solely on the person's illness-- focus on the person instead. If the patient wants to talk about the illness or the upcoming end of life, listen; don't push aside their concerns or give pat answers. Don't think "I'll upset the person"; talking about a terminal illness does not have to always be sad and emotional.
It is usually used to relieve pain in the terminily ill patient.
A terminally ill patient's treatment plan
this patient will surely die!!
If terminally ill person approves change it is legal If terminally ill person disapproves change it is illegal If terminally ill person is not able to approve or disapprove it should not be changed
the money going to the terminally ill patient, can now go to other patients who have a higher chance to live compared to a terminally ill or brain dead patient.
Euthanasia is only done if the patient wants to after they have been evaluated to be of sane mind. So yes, if that fits.
Most any doctor can treat a terminally ill patient. It can be your family doctor or a specialist for whatever disease is causing the problem, like an oncologist for a dying cancer patient. Also alot of hospices have their own doctor who is their medical director.
No. There is no pain killer called Terminal 50. Terminal however, in reference to pain, is often used to refer to the terminally ill patient. That is because many pain patients are terminally ill.
Terminal illness in general assumes a life span of six months or less.
No. it is their life, they should have the right to do as they please with it.
A living will
I wasn't aware it had any affect.