Probably not. While reducing traffic is a noble goal, banning cars in almost any city would severely damage both the shopping and service businesses because many people will avoid the area entirely.
Large cars should be or should not be banned in India
no.
V8 cars should be banned because it uses a great amount of gas and cause a great deal of pollution.
Mackinac Island, Michigan is a city (and an island) where cars have been banned for more than a century.
Not until there are better alternatives.
No
new york when 9/11 happened
s,dfkffkdkfkk
You're asking for a matter of opinion, and mine is no.
cell phones shouldn't generally be banned from cars but just not used. Cell phones do cause major accidents and stuff but there is no reason to be brutal like banning them.
No, black cars are not being banned in California, they did consider to do so in 2009, but then decided not to.
Cars have been the worlds most efficient way of transport since they have been invented. I assume that this question is considering banning the cars because of the accidents they have been involved in. However, accidents that are car related have been caused by more than 90% by humans, through either fatigue, bad driving skills, drink driving, speeding, or distractions in general. Only 10% of accidents that cars have been involved in are caused by mechanical failures. Therefore, cars should not be banned but more or less people should be banned from driving them. Hope this helps and makes sense to you.