Special curved lenses are used to make objects larger. It is a sense of scale and perception that makes distant objects magnified.
The question makes no sense.
If there was no gravity, objects would not be pulled towards the center of the earth, so they would not go straight. Instead, they would continue in whatever direction they were moving until acted upon by another force.
You can develop your stereognostic sense by actively engaging in activities that require you to rely on touch and proprioception, such as playing blindfolded games, sculpting or molding objects without looking, and practicing with tactile discrimination tasks like identifying objects in a bag without seeing them. Consistent practice and repetition will help improve your ability to recognize objects by touch and spatial awareness.
Gravity is a force of attraction between objects with mass, and it does not have a distinct smell. It is a fundamental force of nature that influences the motion of objects in the universe, but it cannot be perceived through the sense of smell.
The mirror is convexed so it sees a larger area. If you see a larger area in the same size mirror then it is reasonable to understand that things are smaller which corresponds to further away. So, you must mentally realize that they are closer.
Distant Sense of Random Menace was created in 2004.
The question makes no sense. Objects are buoyant in a surrounding fluid; change the fluid, change their buoyancy.
This questions makes no sense, please clarify.
that makes no sense that makes no sense that makes no sense
It can effect the air around it affect the object that is heated as well
Othello's hamartia would either be his misplaced trust upon Iago or his magnified sense of jealousy.
"Opposite" only makes sense for simple properties, such as "high", "fast", "intelligent", etc. - not for complex objects or ideas.
Your question makes no sense. Please resubmit.Your question makes no sense. Please resubmit.Your question makes no sense. Please resubmit.Your question makes no sense. Please resubmit.Your question makes no sense. Please resubmit.Your question makes no sense. Please resubmit.Your question makes no sense. Please resubmit.Your question makes no sense. Please resubmit.Your question makes no sense. Please resubmit.
There is none. "Opposite" makes sense for most adjectives (properties) such as high, fast, clever, dark, etc.; it doesn't make sense to talk about the "opposite" of complicated objects.
something like"I can jump" makes sense but"I do pull"does not make sense
Please resubmit your question. It makes no sense the way it is written.Please resubmit your question. It makes no sense the way it is written.Please resubmit your question. It makes no sense the way it is written.Please resubmit your question. It makes no sense the way it is written.Please resubmit your question. It makes no sense the way it is written.Please resubmit your question. It makes no sense the way it is written.Please resubmit your question. It makes no sense the way it is written.Please resubmit your question. It makes no sense the way it is written.Please resubmit your question. It makes no sense the way it is written.
There is no such thing. It makes sense to talk about opposites of simple properties (adjectives), such as "fast", "clever", etc.; in general, it doesn't make so much sense to talk about the opposites of objects (nouns).