yes u fool!
eye lid
When Charles Hodge wrote "What is Darwinism?" in 1874 and argued that evolution can not explain the complexities of the eye is when creationism was first used as a tool against evolution. Before that, Thomas Aquinas and later William Paley used the design argument to 'prove' God's existence, as a small group in the United States are doing today, and the story of Creation was believed to be literally true by all Christian sects. However, it was not called 'Creationism' as there was no opposing theory at the time.
To be politically correct: no. To be correct: yes. Although he didn't invent the actual device, he is credited with figuring out the facts needed to design and construct most types of optics. i) Figured out how to make concave and convex lenses by melting glass with ?steam?. ii) Figured out the mathematical calculations for said scope. iii) Figured out the perceptual limitations of the eye. iv) Figured out the scientific method and defunked most theories in respect to mythology being involved in our perception.
There was not, in ancient Egyptian myth, a "eye of Anubis"; the "eye of Ra"/"eye of Horus" referred to the counterpart protective goddess who defeated the enemies of Ra/Horus. The "Eye of Horus" symbol itself was of the Upper Egypt goddess Wadjet.
I just poked myself in the eye.The cylops stared at me through his beady eye and roared.'An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind'
Are you looking for an "analogy?" As in poetry? Or as in biology?
There have been various philosophical arguments that attempt to prove the existence of God. One of these is known formally as the teleological argument, which holds that because there is order in the world, God must exist. William Paley (1743-1805) was a strong advocate for this argument.Paley's favourite example of design in nature is the eye, whose delicate and intricate mechanism he discusses in great detail. He says (Natural Theology):"Were there no example in the world of contrivance except that of the eye, it would be alone sufficient to support the conclusion which we draw from it, as to the necessity of an intelligent Creator. It could never be got rid of because it could not be accounted for by any other supposition, which did not contradict all the principles we possess of knowledge."Since the time of Paley, the teleological argument has been shown to be an unsound argument. As for his favourite example of design in nature, which he said could not be accounted for by any other supposition than an intelligent Creator, biologists have found numerous examples of more primitive eyes in nature and can plot the stages of the evolution of the human eye.
William Porterfield has written: 'A treatise on the eye' -- subject(s): Eye, Vision
The pupil of the eye can be likened to a camera aperture. Just as an aperture controls the amount of light entering a camera, the pupil regulates the amount of light entering the eye.
He didnt actually invent anything thing or instrument but he did make eye surgery a big thing in new Zealand and Australia
her goal was to accomplish laser eye surgery and invent it.
blue
no a**
Harold did not kill William. William killed Harold by shooting an arrow in his eye.
William R. Lee has written: 'Ophthalmic histopathology' -- subject(s): Eye, Eye Diseases, Histopathology, Pathology
he was struck in the eye by an arrow
Yes