The diameter must be expressed in a unit of distance/length - for example in light-years - NOT in years.
The answer is that the distant parts of the Universe are going away from us, faster than the speed of light. Inside its own local space, nothing can move faster than the speed of light. But in the case of the expansion of the Universe, you might say that space itself is expanding. This makes it possible for objects to move away from us faster than light.
There is no end. They Universe is always expanding due to the big bang. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- No, the Universe actually closes in on itself. If you left from here in any direction, and you went far enough and fast enough, you would arrive right back here. In any case, the Universe does not have any boundaries.
It is impossible to answer. The visible Universe is about 13.7 billion light years across and getting larger with every year. The Solar System is a mere 2 light years at most, a mere 6'850'000'000 of that number.
The farthest light has traveled is 13.8 billion light years from Earth, which is the observable edge of the observable universe.
No,there is no limit to space. For all practical purposes that is true ; BUT space can not expand faster than light and it only started to expand about 13.7 billion years ago So ... imagine a sphere 27.4 light-years across - and all space exists within it.
Diameters of stars are not usually expressed in light-years. The term "light-year" is used for much larger distances. Its diameter is somewhere around a thousand times the diameter of our Sun, so that would be about 1.4 billion kilometers. Of course, you can convert that to light-years if you like.
The observable Universe has a diameter estimated at 93 billion light-years.
300 sextillion.
The observable universe is thought to be a sphere about 93 billion light years in diameter (see related link).
The OBSERVABLE Universe has a diameter of about 93 billion light-years. "Observable" means that the light of anything beyond that hasn't had time to reach us, since the time of the Big Bang.
The observable Universe has a radius of about 46 billion light-years; that would be a diameter of 92 billion light-years. The entire Universe is likely much bigger, but it isn't know how much bigger.
That would be the distance from one edge of the Known Universe to the other. As the Known Universe is believed to be approximately 15 billion years old, that would be 30 billion light years in diameter.
1.5 trillion.
The universe is all existing matter and space considered as the cosmos. It is at least 10 billion light years in diameter,
The universe is 78 billion light years in radius, 156 billion in diameter. 1 light year is how long it will take you to travel at the speed of light so if it's 78 billion light years in radius then it would take you 78 billion years to travel that far. Also people have said that if you go far enough the number of partial combinations will run out and you will start to see exact replicas of the world you know and love.
Yes, all 100 billion galaxies in the observable universe up to 13.5 billion light-years away.
The observable universe is significantly bigger than 13.7 billion light-years in diameter; it's closer to 14 billion parsecs radius, which gives a diameter of around 93 billion light-years.That said ... no, it can't. It can't even map the much smaller subset of the observable universe you describe, because large swathes of sky are blocked by the rest of the Milky Way galaxy; we can only see objects that are significantly outside the plane of the galaxy itself.
No, because it will be impossible for Hubble make a 3D map of at least 100 billion galaxies (i.e. 60 billion spiral and barred spiral galaxies, 20 billion lenticular galaxies, 15 billion elliptical galaxies, and 5 billion irregular/peculiar galaxies) in the observable universe, at distances up to 13 billion light-years; since the observable universe is 13.7 billion light-years in diameter.