The radii of stars generally increase with their mass due to the relationship described by the mass-radius relation in stellar astrophysics. More massive stars possess stronger gravitational forces, which result in higher pressures and temperatures in their cores, leading to larger radii as they expand. However, this relationship is not linear; while main-sequence stars follow a trend where radius increases with mass, giants and supergiants can have much larger radii relative to their mass. Overall, more massive stars tend to be larger, but the exact relationship can vary depending on a star's evolutionary stage.
The typical size of a white dwarf is about the size of Earth, which is approximately 0.008 solar radii. White dwarfs are very dense objects that have collapsed from the remnants of low to medium mass stars.
The radius of a star is generally proportional to its mass. More massive stars tend to have larger radii compared to less massive stars. This relationship is governed by the balance between the gravitational force pulling the star inward and the pressure from nuclear fusion reactions pushing outward.
A star's radius is the distance from it centre to its visible surface. The bigger the star, the larger the radius. The radius is not the best means of comparing stars, it is perhaps better to compare stars by their mass.
Actully, there are more than just four stars bigger than the sun. 5% of the stars are bigger than the sun. The sun just looks so big because it's closer to Earth. :~)
The typical size of a white dwarf is about the size of Earth, which is approximately 0.008 solar radii. White dwarfs are very dense objects that have collapsed from the remnants of low to medium mass stars.
The radius of a star is generally proportional to its mass. More massive stars tend to have larger radii compared to less massive stars. This relationship is governed by the balance between the gravitational force pulling the star inward and the pressure from nuclear fusion reactions pushing outward.
Typically,giant stars have radii between 10 and 100 solar radii and luminosities between 10 and 1,000 times that of the Sun.Whereas Supergiants have a radii between 30 and 1,000 solar radii and luminosities between 30,000 and 100,000 times that of the Sun
A star's radius is the distance from it centre to its visible surface. The bigger the star, the larger the radius. The radius is not the best means of comparing stars, it is perhaps better to compare stars by their mass.
Actully, there are more than just four stars bigger than the sun. 5% of the stars are bigger than the sun. The sun just looks so big because it's closer to Earth. :~)
-- If your mass is 'm', then your mass is 'm', regardless of whether you're on the earth,2 earth radii out in space, or on the moon. Mass doesn't change.-- On the surface, your distance from the center of the earth is 1 earth radius. Weight isinversely proportional to the square of the distance from the center of the earth, so at adistance of 3 earth radii from the center, your weight is 1/32 = 1/9th of your weight on thesurface. If your mass is 'm' then your weight on the surface is mg = 9.8m newtons, and at3 earth radii from the center it's 1.089m newtons (rounded).
A solar radii is a unit of measurement used to describe the size or distance of an object relative to the Sun. It is often used in astronomy to compare the size of stars or planets to that of the Sun. One solar radii is equal to the radius of the Sun.
The universe is a much more complicated place than you seem to believe.The radius of a white dwarf star (I assume you mean a degenerate dwarf, not a main sequence star that happens to be white, which could also be called a "white dwarf") depends on its mass. An interesting property is that higher-mass stars have smallerradii.While we can't provide "an exact number in kilometers" (or any other unit), we can say that the majority of white dwarfs have radii between 0.008 and 0.02 solar radii (5600 to 14000 kilometers).
An isolated and distinct mass of stars is a galaxy.
High mass stars have a faster rate of burning compared to low mass stars. This is because high mass stars have more gravitational pressure in their cores, leading to faster nuclear reactions and higher energy output. This results in a shorter lifespan for high mass stars compared to low mass stars.
its not about stars its about mass and he proposed that mass can be converted into energy
They produce light.