How do you feel about space exploration?

Answer 1

We have a technology problem regarding space exploration remaining with impulse powers; that is when one pushes an accelerator and a fuel is expended for propulsion. Since NASA has its shuttles flying around 20,000 mph in a atmosphere that has exterior pressure vs. the Diracian vacuum (Dr. Paul Dirac proved no pure vacuum exists or empty space), that causes tremendous exterior stress upon the vehicle. In other words, the situation reveals that Einstein explained that physical matter could not go beyond lightspeed and that is empirically true and mathematically proven. However, albeit not proven, and subatomic quantum physics is also just a probability as of Max Born's discoveries, that the physical matter is altered naturally once travelling beyond 300,000 kps (kilometres per second - lightspeed limit for physical matter - the photon). However, no one is willing to take that risk and understandable as of human life. Thus, the idea of robotics becoming more sophisticated is appropriate so that we do not risk a human travelling beyond the speed of light initially. If the robot survives, perhaps the human would? Can we know for sure unless the robot or android has exacting human qualities?

The emphasis here I would like to stress is that the main problem exists with special relativity wherein it is believed that if man travelled lightspeed, he would return and everyone would be dead and gone. The lightspeed traveller, however, would not age any if he made the jump to lightspeed (sounds very Trekkie) and did not gradually accelerate to lightspeed. In other words, he did not travel in impulse speeds at all getting to lightspeed. What is being missed and I proved in a classroom years ago with professors agreeing (if not publishing does not exist - another problem) that the deceleration is not taken into consideration. But that is a huge mistake regarding the fallacy of time dilation or expansion. It would seem too simple an explanation for debunking special relativity and time dilation but we are ingenuous more than ingenious and call it what you will. The issue remains that whilst in motion one's aging slows down, but decelerating from that motion, one returns to the original time line. With the deceleration curve in the equation, no time expansion exists physically and therefore, time travel is impossible physically and space exploration is real possibility. No age differences will exist unless one is gone in a normal time frame. If one is gone for two days on earth whilst in space, they will be gone two days in space and return. Nothing difficult here; simple child's play as everything really is in ingenuousity. We travel at 60 mph and are age is imperceptibly slowing down, but once the car break is applied, we are back to the original time-line. Motion causes age clocks to slow down, but not real clocks. The probability that real clocks slow in lightspeed is ludicrous, they are a machine that continues in their own time not physical relativity. Space travel is important but FtL (Faster than Lightspeed) is necessary. Without concern for time dilation which is silly unless never stopping, FtL can be created.

Answer 2

Space exploration is an exciting and valuable endeavor that pushes the boundaries of our understanding of the universe and drives innovation in technology. It has the potential to reveal new information about our place in the cosmos and inspire future generations to pursue science and exploration.