There are fundamental differences and similarities between a solar versus human life cycle. As in humans, stars are born and they will die. Stars produce energy. Both humans and suns produce energy, but by different means. Humans produce our energy through chemical respiration, a combustion reaction. Stars however use nuclear fusion. Another chief difference is that human life can be measured at most in decades or a century while stars can live for billions of years, and even longer after their "deaths" in their new forms as dwarfs and black holes.
rrrrr
Short, violent, and ends as a black hole.
Stars begin their life cycles in a nebula.
Understanding the life cycle of stars helps us comprehend the universe's evolution and the elements present in it. It also provides insights into how galaxies form and evolve. Additionally, knowledge of star life cycles aids in predicting supernovae events and the creation of black holes.
Stars go through stages like birth, main sequence, red giant, and death, which can last millions or billions of years. In comparison, humans have a much shorter life cycle, typically living for decades. Both stars and humans undergo changes over time and eventually cease to exist.
How does the life cycle of humans compare to the life cycle of a star? They both have stages where they are born and die which is in the main sequence and supernova and in a human they are born in a womb and die of old age.
Nobody "invented" it, the life cycle of stars happens naturally.
The "star life cycle" refers to stars. Earth is not a star.
In the nebula!
A protostar generates energy by friction whereas a main sequence star generates energy by fusion.
i don't know. you guess are so stupid you.
The smaller a star is, the longer its life cycle.
the answer is a protostar
they both have 5 main stages
How does recruitment fit into the hr life cycle
The more the mass the shorter their life cycle (the more quickly they use their fuel)