Largely by it's size and color. To keep it simple, if all stars were the same size, blue and blue/white stars would be the youngest, white stars next, then yellow stars (middle aged, like our Sun) and red stars. But size also figures into it. A medium sized blue star has a long life ahead of it. A very big blue star will have a shorter life: Bigger "engine", faster "speed", sooner "breakdown", basically. Stars begin life as mostly hydrogen. Their size creates tremendous pressure in their centers which converts the hydrogen to helium, creating as a by-product tremendous heat. As the hydrogen becomes used up, the star cools somewhat and expands - getting larger and redder. Old Age, as it were. This is all very simplified, but it gives you the general picture. Astronomers classify stars as type O (hottest) through B, A, F, G, K, and M, with many subcategories within those! Our sun is an utterly ordinary type K star, about halfway through it's expected lifetime of 8-9 billion years right now.
The life cycle path of a star is determined by its initial mass. Higher mass stars have shorter life spans and end in violent supernova explosions, forming neutron stars or black holes, while lower mass stars like the Sun evolve into red giants and eventually shed their outer layers to form planetary nebulae.
The Sun is the name of the STAR we cling to. All STARS are infernos.
The life cycle of a star is determined primarily by its mass. The hotter a star the bluer its color. The difference between apparent brightness and luminosity is that luminosity is a good indicator of the energy output of a star.
rrrrr
The Hertzsprung-Russell diagram was a valuable tool for helping astrophysicists work out the stellar life cycle. Arrange all the stars by color (frequency) from left to right, with the bluest on the left and the reddest on the right. Then sort these all by size from top to bottom, with the largest on top. Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar was an astronomer from India who determined the process of how stars form, shine, age, and die, and was awarded the Nobel Prize for his work on that subject.
The life cycle path of a star is determined by its initial mass. Higher mass stars have shorter life spans and end in violent supernova explosions, forming neutron stars or black holes, while lower mass stars like the Sun evolve into red giants and eventually shed their outer layers to form planetary nebulae.
Nobody "invented" it, the life cycle of stars happens naturally.
The "star life cycle" refers to stars. Earth is not a star.
In the nebula!
The Sun is the name of the STAR we cling to. All STARS are infernos.
A star's "life cycle" depends mostly on its initial mass; everything is determined by mass. Small, low-mass stars may shine essentially forever, while very large high-mass stars may grow old and go supernova in only a few dozen million years.
The life cycle of a star is determined primarily by its mass. The hotter a star the bluer its color. The difference between apparent brightness and luminosity is that luminosity is a good indicator of the energy output of a star.
The smaller a star is, the longer its life cycle.
the answer is a protostar
The more the mass the shorter their life cycle (the more quickly they use their fuel)
Stars are "born", mature, reach old age, then "die".
Astro means star its study of the life cycle of stars