That would depend entirely on how the solar power is harnessed, but using the common methods: none.
Solar power is consider cleaner because it doesn't pollute the atmosphere with carbon dioxide (CO2) and it is easier to run. Both answers are sadly the common view and both are very wrong. Solar power systems are very complicated to run. The massive amount of complex equipment make solar a very difficult system to operate and maintain. They are also very high maintenance. Most solar power systems also have a backup fossil fuel plant that produces almost as much CO2 as would be produced without the solar array even being installed. This means that solar actually produces less then zero power. What it does do is allow for credits that moeset the CO2 produced and makes people feel good about the rising use of power and energy. Coal's issue is not CO2 either. Levels of CO2 have increased in out atmospere from 0.030 to 0.038% (questionably). Suloher dioxide is a much larger issue from coal and leads to acid rain.
The amount of CO2 produced would depend on the type of light bulb and its wattage. As a general estimate, an incandescent bulb (60W) would produce approximately 0.9 kg of CO2 if left on for 35 hours, while an LED bulb (10W) would produce about 0.15 kg of CO2.
You can't use fossil fuels (coal, oil and natural gas) for solar power. You can use fossil fuels to burn to make electricity. Solar power is another way of generating electricity that is better, without negative consequences. The negative effects of using fossil fuels are the polluting greenhouse gases emitted, mostly carbon dioxide (CO2). These gases are building in the atmosphere and causing global warming.
If it replaces power that would otherwise produce carbon dioxide, then it must do so, because it does not emit CO2. This is not taking account of the process of manufacture of the solar panels-this may cause some pollution. Addition: The CO2 cost of manufacturing solar panels is cancelled out in just a few years of using the solar panels for energy, whether they are photovoltaic panels for electricity, or solar thermal panels for heating hot water.
Venus has the most carbon dioxide atmosphere among the planets in our solar system, with over 96% of its atmosphere composed of CO2.
The amount of CO2 produced by a 10 Megawatt power station would depend on the type of fuel it uses. For example, a coal-fired power station would produce around 25,000 tons of CO2 per year, while a natural gas power station would produce around 15,000 tons of CO2 per year.
Solar power is consider cleaner because it doesn't pollute the atmosphere with carbon dioxide (CO2) and it is easier to run. Both answers are sadly the common view and both are very wrong. Solar power systems are very complicated to run. The massive amount of complex equipment make solar a very difficult system to operate and maintain. They are also very high maintenance. Most solar power systems also have a backup fossil fuel plant that produces almost as much CO2 as would be produced without the solar array even being installed. This means that solar actually produces less then zero power. What it does do is allow for credits that moeset the CO2 produced and makes people feel good about the rising use of power and energy. Coal's issue is not CO2 either. Levels of CO2 have increased in out atmospere from 0.030 to 0.038% (questionably). Suloher dioxide is a much larger issue from coal and leads to acid rain.
There are NO houses that make electricity into CO2. Electrical equipment has no CO2 outlet. The CO2 is produced at the power plant that supplies the house, so when you plug in a kettle, for example, the generator at the power plant works a tiny bit harder and produces more CO2. The CO2 produced is closely matched with the power that is generated there.
Solar panels save CO if you accept that electricity generation normally produces CO2 when the fuel is burnt. 1 kWh of electric energy results in about 1 kg of CO2 from a conventional power plant, so if that 1 kWh were generated by solar, that saves 1 kg of CO2. 1 kWh generated by a wind turbine also saves 1 kg of CO2. In this equation you also have to consider any CO2 emitted at the factories that make the solar panels etc., but this is not very much.
Wind energy being used in wind mill would not produce CO2 Nuclear power plants would not produce CO2 Hydropower would not produce CO2 Why not? Solar energy in case of solar cells would not produce CO2
On average, about 0.45 kg of CO2 is produced for every kilowatt-hour (kWh) of electricity generated in the United States. However, this value can vary depending on the fuel source used for electricity generation.
Burning 1 kg of LPG produces approximately 2.98 kg of CO2.
a lot.
On average, 1 MW coal-fired power plant produces approximately 1 ton of CO2 for every 1 MWh (megawatt-hour) of electricity generated. This means that in one hour of operation, a 1 MW coal-based power plant would produce around 1 ton of CO2 emissions.
The amount of CO2 produced when walking is very minimal. Walking does not use any fossil fuels and does not emit pollutants into the atmosphere, making it an environmentally friendly mode of transportation.
The number is zero.No CO2 is produced in glycolisis.
Yes, carbon dioxide (CO2) is produced as a byproduct during fermentation.