13.4 -15.4=2
so 2 % brighter
Distance
The Sun (Sol) has an apparent magnitude of - 26.74Siruis (Dog star) with an apparent magnitude of -1.47 (Brightest in the Northern Hemisphere)Canopus with an apparent magnitude of -0.72 (Brightest in the Southern Hemisphere)Arcturus with an apparent magnitude of -0.04 (Variable)Alpha Centauri A with an apparent magnitude of -0.01Vega with an apparent magnitude of 0.03Rigel with apparent magnitude of 0.18Procyon with apparent magnitude of 0.34Achernar with apparent magnitude of 0.50Betelgeuse with apparent magnitude of 0.58 (Variable)A lower number means more brightness. All of these are apparent magnitudes. If you mean intrinsic magnitude, the answers are somewhat different. Sirius and Alpha Centauri A are bright because they're close to us. Canopus, on the other hand, is much brighter, but also much further away (Sirius is about 8 light years away; Canopus is more than 300 light years away).Off subject:Some planets are brighter (in apparent magnitude) than stars; for example, when Venus appears in the sky, she is always the brightest object (after the Sun and the Moon). In fact, Venus is bright enough to be seen in the broad daylight, if you know where to look. Planets look like stars, but their movement between the stars can be detected if you observe them just for a few nights.
Absolutely. When speaking of the brightness you see from earth, you are speaking of apparent magnitude. When considering the type of star, it's composition, stage, age, size, distance, etc., a star is also assigned an absolute magnitude, so the ranking of the star if seen from similar distances reveals the truth about a star. 3.26 light years away is the assumed distance in ranking stars. A star many times farther away than a second star may appear much brighter than the second star which is much closer, based partially on the various factors mentioned above. The lower the value for a magnitude, the brighter, or more correctly, the more luminous, a star. Thus, a 3.4 is brighter than a 5.1, for example. Long ago the scale was originally an arbitrary ranking based on certain stars that were considered to be the brightest. Since then, stars even brighter have been identified, thus the need to use values even less than zero. Only a handful of stars fall below zero in apparent magnitude. So then it is not significant where in the sky (in what constellation) a star lies, the magnitude value determines the brightness.
Yes, in "absolute magnitude", Mizar is much brighter than the Sun.
A stars brightness depends on two factors; its distance from us and its actual brightness (absolute magnitude). The actual brightness of a star depends on various factors, such as its mass, its temperature and its age.Consider two stars of the same actual brightness (absolute magnitude) - if one of them is much closer, then is will be brighter than the further one. It will appear brighter, even though it would be the same side by side - it can be said to be apparently brighter (higher apparent magnitude) due to its distance.A:They appear bigger and brighter because they really are bigger and brighter, but even if they are not bigger and brighter it could be because they are closer.
A star or other heavenly body whose visual magnitude is -5 is 2,154.4 times as bright as another body with visual magnitude of +5.
Distance
Distance
The numeric value of the apparent magnitude would increase, since bright objects have lower magnitude values than dim objects.To give some actual numbers as an example: the Sun has an apparent magnitude of about -27. It is much, much brighter than the moon, which at its brightest has an apparent magnitude of -13 or so.
The apparent magnitude of a star is a measure of its brightness as seen from Earth, the lower the number, the brighter a star is. Ex. a star that has an apparent magnitude of -20 is WAY brighter from Earth than a star with a apparent magnitude of 20.
The greater a star's magnitude, the brighter it appears in the sky. Magnitude is a scale of apparent brightness as seen from Earth and says nothing about how large a star actually is or how much energy it is radiating. A small star that is closer may have a greater magnitude, as seen from Earth, than a large, active star that is much further away.
It all depends on where you view them from. The apparent magnitude, is defined as being viewed from Earth Betelgeuse: 0.58 - Brighter Zeta Orionis (Alnitak) = 1.70 The absolute magnitude, is defined as being viewed from a distance of 10 parsecs. Betelgeuse: -5.14 Zeta Orionis: -5.25 - Brighter
A magnitude 1 star is 100 times brighter than a magnitude 6 star.A magnitude 1 star is 100 times brighter than a magnitude 6 star.A magnitude 1 star is 100 times brighter than a magnitude 6 star.A magnitude 1 star is 100 times brighter than a magnitude 6 star.
The Sun (Sol) has an apparent magnitude of - 26.74Siruis (Dog star) with an apparent magnitude of -1.47 (Brightest in the Northern Hemisphere)Canopus with an apparent magnitude of -0.72 (Brightest in the Southern Hemisphere)Arcturus with an apparent magnitude of -0.04 (Variable)Alpha Centauri A with an apparent magnitude of -0.01Vega with an apparent magnitude of 0.03Rigel with apparent magnitude of 0.18Procyon with apparent magnitude of 0.34Achernar with apparent magnitude of 0.50Betelgeuse with apparent magnitude of 0.58 (Variable)A lower number means more brightness. All of these are apparent magnitudes. If you mean intrinsic magnitude, the answers are somewhat different. Sirius and Alpha Centauri A are bright because they're close to us. Canopus, on the other hand, is much brighter, but also much further away (Sirius is about 8 light years away; Canopus is more than 300 light years away).Off subject:Some planets are brighter (in apparent magnitude) than stars; for example, when Venus appears in the sky, she is always the brightest object (after the Sun and the Moon). In fact, Venus is bright enough to be seen in the broad daylight, if you know where to look. Planets look like stars, but their movement between the stars can be detected if you observe them just for a few nights.
Absolutely. When speaking of the brightness you see from earth, you are speaking of apparent magnitude. When considering the type of star, it's composition, stage, age, size, distance, etc., a star is also assigned an absolute magnitude, so the ranking of the star if seen from similar distances reveals the truth about a star. 3.26 light years away is the assumed distance in ranking stars. A star many times farther away than a second star may appear much brighter than the second star which is much closer, based partially on the various factors mentioned above. The lower the value for a magnitude, the brighter, or more correctly, the more luminous, a star. Thus, a 3.4 is brighter than a 5.1, for example. Long ago the scale was originally an arbitrary ranking based on certain stars that were considered to be the brightest. Since then, stars even brighter have been identified, thus the need to use values even less than zero. Only a handful of stars fall below zero in apparent magnitude. So then it is not significant where in the sky (in what constellation) a star lies, the magnitude value determines the brightness.
For historical reasons, the ratio of brightness that represents a change of 1 visual magnitude is defined as the 5th root of 100. So the ratio of brightness between two stars whose apparent visual magnitudes differ by 1 is 2.512 (rounded). The brighter star is 2.512 times as bright as the 'dimmer' one . A difference of 5 magnitudes is a difference of 100 times in brightness, which the difference between a 1st magnitude star and a 6th magnitude one.
Yes, in "absolute magnitude", Mizar is much brighter than the Sun.