The former is 10 times brighter than the latter.
Yes, in "absolute magnitude", Mizar is much brighter than the Sun.
it isn't the sun is 450000 times brighter than the moon! no..
No, a welder is not brighter than the sun. The sun is a star and emits much more light and energy than any welding process.
The sun appears brighter than Rigel does because it is much closer to us by a factor of about 50 million.
no you are stupid if you are answering this
The former is greater than the latter
The former is greater than the latter
The latter is greater than the former
Yes, in "absolute magnitude", Mizar is much brighter than the Sun.
Both. The latter is more archaic than the former.
it isn't the sun is 450000 times brighter than the moon! no..
No, a welder is not brighter than the sun. The sun is a star and emits much more light and energy than any welding process.
The sun appears brighter than Rigel does because it is much closer to us by a factor of about 50 million.
It depends almost entirely on whether the global culture is mostly universalistic or particularistic. In the former, the influence of particularism is relatively minor, which in the latter it will be much larger. Since the culture of the US is mostly the former type, there are fewer examples of particularism than in others where the latter is practiced by a higher percentage of the population.
The latter enables you to understand through attention, the former enables you to acknowledge sound.
no you are stupid if you are answering this
Our Sun appears brighter than Alpha Centauri B because of its proximity to our point of view. We are much closer to our Sun then any other star which means that our Sun will be much brighter then everything else in the sky.