Why, the telescope, of course! Using his telescope, Galileo was able to make observations of the heavens in a way no one else was able to before.
Humans are able to detect pulsars when one of their beams crosses paths with the Earth. When this happens, we are able to detect the resulting electromagnetic radiation in the radar spectrum.
Jupiter. The "Galilean" moons are the four largest moons, which are so large that Galileo was able to see them orbiting Jupiter even with his relatively modest telescope.
The light from the red glare you would be able to see it.
There is no definite answer to this question. A religious person would tell you without a doubt that yes there is. A devout athiest would tell you that there is not a heaven. Both would be wrong, you see if there is indeed a heaven then you have to die to go there (pretty convenient way of keeping people from trying to prove/disprove this theory). But for someone to say that they know for a fact that there is no heaven would be ignorant because just as religion has not been able to prove there is a heaven, science has not been able to prove that there is not.
Galileo Galilei constructed telescopes to conduct his observations. He also disproved the Ptolemaic model.
No. Not being able to prove something is NOT the same as it being true.
A 'testable' hypothesis is one in which you are able to conduct experiments in able to prove right or wrong.
Someone believes that someone cheated or the count was wrong or done wrong or something was done illegally. You better be able to prove it.
they were able to prove that they were stupid heads!!!!!
Money is a big motivator for people. Being able to prove people wrong is also something that people use to motivate them.
Copernicus created the mathematical theory to prove that the Sun, not the Earth, was the centre of our solar system. Galilei provided the calculations and observations to prove Copernicus' theory.
It was hard life time to accomplish great things but Galileo was able to
Galileo used more advanced technology to find stronger observational evidence than Copernicus was ever able to provide.
Yes. Just be able to prove where you were at the time written on the ticket. Can you PROVE beyond a shadow of a doubt that you were somewhere else at the time/date on the ticket?
they thought it was holes to be able to dump in them
There were two Until Galileo's experiment, it was widely believed that large objects fell to Earth faster than small ones. That is, it was thought that if two objects of different sizes were dropped from the same height, the larger one would strike the ground first. Galileo showed that not to be the case. But his experiment was extraordinary for another reason. Galileo discredited another Aristotlian idea: that natural phenomena could be explained solely via analysis. Up until Galileo's time, the scientific method had yet to be developed; experimentation was largely unheard of. Proving or disproving a hypothesis via experimentation was not done. Aristotle and his peers believed that natural laws were discovered through discussion and argumentation, and the philosopher who articulated and defended his theories most persuasively was credited with their discovery. Validation through experimentation was not required.He dropped two cannonballs of different masses from the tower and watched them hit the ground at the same time, disproving Aristotle's theory that mass affects the gravity in acted on an object. He proving that mass doesn't matter but air resistance does. But, it was never proved the experiment was done at the leaning tower of Pisa.Debates had started up on one of aristoles laws of nature, that heavier objects fell faster than lighter objects. Galileo wanted to try. He needed to be able to drop the weights from a tall height. The perfect building was The leaning tower of Pisa that was 54 metres tall. He dropped the 2 weights and found out that aristole was wrong. Because the two weights fell at the same time.