Write it down.
answ2. A Laboratory Book is a very important part of laboratory equipment. In it are recorded the actual results of an experiment.
The pages of a lab book should be serially numbered, and each day's work ruled off. This process is important when "priority of discovery" is needed.
Naturally, graphs, computer results, photos and sketches all form part of the record, and are pasted in and dated.
Eventually of course, the results and significance of investigations are submitted to a science journal for publication.
i think it is because then they could see their notes again later and see if anything has changed. but i am not sure.
A scientist may create an hypothesis on the basis of their observations. If their observations are carelessly made or recorded then any hypotheses they offer will be inaccurate reflections of nature. A scientist may alternatively collect observations to test an hypothesis. If these observations are carelessly made or recorded then the conclusions that the scientist makes about the hypothesis could very well be incorrect. At the very least the conclusions they draw would not be based on sound evidence (because the observations are unsound).
Recording observations in real-time allows for accurate and detailed documentation of events as they occur. This can help in analyzing patterns, identifying trends, and making informed decisions based on the data collected. Additionally, recorded observations provide a reliable reference point for future evaluation and comparison.
Galleleo
A scientist needs to be observant to carefully gather data, notice patterns or anomalies, and draw accurate conclusions from their observations. Being observant allows a scientist to make informed decisions, detect cause-and-effect relationships, and formulate new hypotheses for further investigation.
Before the scientific revolution scientists would do mostly observations. These observations are what lead to the rise of patterns and the need for the scientific revolution.
i think it is because then they could see their notes again later and see if anything has changed. but i am not sure.
A scientist may create an hypothesis on the basis of their observations. If their observations are carelessly made or recorded then any hypotheses they offer will be inaccurate reflections of nature. A scientist may alternatively collect observations to test an hypothesis. If these observations are carelessly made or recorded then the conclusions that the scientist makes about the hypothesis could very well be incorrect. At the very least the conclusions they draw would not be based on sound evidence (because the observations are unsound).
is studying, collecting data and recording relevant information. These observations are based on the scientist's senses and are typically objective and unbiased. The scientist may use various tools and techniques to aid in making accurate observations.
Study Island Answer.... Report her results to the scientific community.
Using a recorder :P
By making mistakes.(:
Before the scientific revolution scientists would do mostly observations. These observations are what lead to the rise of patterns and the need for the scientific revolution.
He urged people to use their sences to make observations, just as scientist today make observations
1. So they can record what they have learned 2. They can write down or jot down there observations 3. Scientist can write big or words they don't know 4. Scientist can write down plans or projects in there notebook
Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, a Dutch scientist, was the first to record biological observations using a microscope. He used single-lens microscopes of his own design to study microorganisms in the 17th century.
You would obviously record your observations in the first part of the scientific method i.e titled commonly as "Observation". Because only after recording your observation you can move onto the second part of scientific method i.e "Questioning".