it would still appear to rotate
Everybody on Earth who can see the moon at any particular moment sees the same phase. The distance across the Earth, is not far, compared to the distance to the moon, for there to be any perceivable change in perspective.
Full, large or whole. Maybe the question was meant to be...How would the Earth appear to an observer on the moon during a full moon?
During the Moon's revolution, an observer in space would see the moon, but would not be able to see it spin around. From far to the north, about the solar system, the moon would appear to make a squiggly
The sun would be 4 times less bright than it is now. The brightness of the sun follows an inverse square law
Yes you would. Interestingly, the Earth would never rise or set - it would remain a prominent feature in the sky. Daylight on the Moon itself lasts roughly 2 weeks because of the rotational and orbital times of the Moon (both approximately 27.3 Earth days) and the Moon's orbital motion around the Sun.
No, an observer from Earth would not see all the planets rotate backward at the same time. This is because each planet rotates on its own axis and orbits the sun independently, so their motions appear to be unique relative to Earth's position.
it would still appear to rotate
Yes. Unless the observer was on the back side of the moon, or on the opposite side of the earth from the moon, he/she could see the same phases that we see here on earth.
On the horizon
Both lunar and solar eclipses are the result of positioning 3 astronomical bodies (earth, sun and moon) in a straight line relative to the observer. A solar eclipse is observed when the sun, moon, and earth are positioned in a straight line with an observer on the earth. A lunar eclipse is observed when the sun, earth, and moon are in a straight line with an observer on the earth. A lunar eclipse, as observed by an observer on the earth would appear as a solar eclipse as observed by an observer on the moon.
Everybody on Earth who can see the moon at any particular moment sees the same phase. The distance across the Earth, is not far, compared to the distance to the moon, for there to be any perceivable change in perspective.
If an observer on Earth sees Polaris on the horizon, they are located at the equator. Polaris, also known as the North Star, is positioned nearly directly above the North Pole, so it is only visible at higher latitudes in the Northern Hemisphere. At the equator, Polaris would appear to be at the horizon, indicating the observer's latitude is 0 degrees.
Full, large or whole. Maybe the question was meant to be...How would the Earth appear to an observer on the moon during a full moon?
If Earth did not rotate, a three-hour time exposure photograph of the northern sky would capture the stars as long, circular trails centered around the North Star, Polaris. The stars would appear to move in concentric circles, with their arcs reflecting the constant position of the observer. The sky would show a series of bright streaks where stars moved across the frame, creating a mesmerizing pattern of light without the typical starfield backdrop seen in rotating Earth photographs. The overall effect would highlight the contrast between the stationary planet and the dynamic celestial movement.
During the Moon's revolution, an observer in space would see the moon, but would not be able to see it spin around. From far to the north, about the solar system, the moon would appear to make a squiggly
The sun would be 4 times less bright than it is now. The brightness of the sun follows an inverse square law
No