While the earth rotates, the moon revolves around it.
While the moon rotates it has different phases.
Improvement : I think this question is about the fact that the Moon's crust seems to be thicker on the "far side". This may be why there's much less
sign of volcanic activity on the far side.
Because when I look up from the Earth, the surface of the Moon looks like nothing on Earth.
The moon Io would look the brightest from the surface of Jupiter because It is the nearest.
Europa would appear the brightest from the surface of Jupiter due to its icy surface reflecting a significant amount of sunlight. Io may also appear bright due to its high volcanic activity, but Europa's icy surface would likely reflect more light overall.
Ganymede would appear the brightest from the surface of Jupiter due to its larger size and higher reflectivity compared to Europa, Callisto, and Io. Ganymede is the largest moon in the solar system and has a highly reflective icy surface, making it more luminous when viewed from Jupiter.
Ganymede would appear to be the brightest moon from the surface of Jupiter. This is because Ganymede is the largest moon in the solar system and it has a high albedo, meaning it reflects a lot of sunlight. Its larger size and reflective surface would make it appear brighter than the other moons when viewed from Jupiter.
Its surface would look like that of the Moon, Mars or Mercury all of which do not have tectonic plates and a fixed crust.
It would look a little different because there will be no living particle on earth
If all the crust above sea level were removed, the Earth would essentially resemble a giant ocean planet with no landmasses visible. The entire surface would be covered by water, leading to a vast global ocean.
tired of looking crust try this product and it will make you look less crust but you will still be crust:)
If Earth's crust did not move and lacked tectonic plates, there would be no plate tectonics, resulting in no volcanic activity, earthquakes, or mountain formation. This would lead to a lack of nutrient cycling and recycling of materials, impacting the diversity and distribution of life on Earth. The absence of tectonic plates would also affect the planet's climate and potentially lead to a stagnant and inhospitable environment.
If most of the Earth's crust was above sea level, we would likely see vast, continuous land masses without large bodies of water separating them. This would result in a planet with significantly less water cover, and the climate, weather patterns, and ecosystems would likely be very different from what we see today.
The Earth's crust is the outermost solid layer of the Earth, forming the Earth's surface. It is found beneath the oceans and continents and varies in thickness, with the oceanic crust being thinner than the continental crust.
Yes, without weathering and erosion, Earth's surface would look significantly different. These processes help shape our landscapes by breaking down rocks and transporting sediments, creating features like mountains, valleys, and coastlines. Without them, much of Earth's surface would remain unchanged over time.
Because when I look up from the Earth, the surface of the Moon looks like nothing on Earth.
like mars
The surface of moon.
wierd