600km 5m <,>,or =
A Ferris wheel has a certain ratio of 2:2:1 - height:length:width because it is a near-perfect circle. From there you can work out other things, but your common fairground wheel is 5m:5m:2.5m.
Alan Shepard was the oldest person to step on the moon during the Apollo 14 mission in 1971 at the age of 47. Charles Duke was the youngest astronaut to walk on the moon during the Apollo 16 mission in 1972 at the age of 36.
In tonnes which are equal to cubic meters of water: 20/3 π R2 Where R is the diameter in meters of the planet Mars. and π is "pi" the well known constant approximated by 22/7 or 3,14159... (the 5 meter depth is incorporates in the 20/3 value)
focal length = half radius of curvature 3/2 = 1.5 focal length of mirror is 1.5m 1/f = 1/u + 1/v 1/1.5 = 1/5 +1/v the focal length is negative however because it is a diverging mirror so -1/1.5 = 1/5 + 1/v -1/1.5 - 1/5 = 1/v -10/15 - 3/15 = 1/v -13/15 = 1/v -15/13 = v v = -1.15m the image is 1.15m back from the mirror and is virtual, diminished and upright magnification = v/u -1.15/5 = -0.23 the image bus is 0.23 times smaller than the object
Absolutely. When speaking of the brightness you see from earth, you are speaking of apparent magnitude. When considering the type of star, it's composition, stage, age, size, distance, etc., a star is also assigned an absolute magnitude, so the ranking of the star if seen from similar distances reveals the truth about a star. 3.26 light years away is the assumed distance in ranking stars. A star many times farther away than a second star may appear much brighter than the second star which is much closer, based partially on the various factors mentioned above. The lower the value for a magnitude, the brighter, or more correctly, the more luminous, a star. Thus, a 3.4 is brighter than a 5.1, for example. Long ago the scale was originally an arbitrary ranking based on certain stars that were considered to be the brightest. Since then, stars even brighter have been identified, thus the need to use values even less than zero. Only a handful of stars fall below zero in apparent magnitude. So then it is not significant where in the sky (in what constellation) a star lies, the magnitude value determines the brightness.
Yes, 600km is bigger than 5m. The letter "k" in km stands for 1000. That means that 600km is equal to 600 x 1000, or 600,000 meters.
greater than
bigger
600km is equivalent to 600,000 meters. Therefore, 600km is longer than 5 meters.
Much bigger of course !
Obviously, since 1 km is 1000 m, we say that 600 km or 600,000 m is greater than 5m.
600 km is greater than 5 m600 km > 5 m
1 km = 1,000 mso 600 km must be a whale of a lot more than 5 m .
yes
600 kilometers is significantly larger than 5 meters. To put it in perspective, 600 kilometers is equivalent to 600,000 meters, making it 120,000 times larger than 5 meters. Thus, 600 kilometers is the larger measurement by a vast margin.
1 km=1000 m hence,600 km is greater than 5m
Yes, 600 kilometers is greater than 5 meters. To put it in perspective, 600 kilometers is equivalent to 600,000 meters, which is significantly larger than just 5 meters. Therefore, 600 km is much greater than 5 m.