yes the space shuttle is expensive then a rocket. dont gt made but i guessed on dis question. but i am kind a sure.. seeya
The space shuttle had three main components: the orbiter, external tank, and solid rocket boosters. The orbiter had wings and resembled a plane. The external tank was a large orange tank, and the solid rocket boosters were two white rocket boosters attached to the sides.
its really both, it goes up like a rocket and comes down like a plane
The next space shuttle to be launched by NASA will be the Space Launch System (SLS), not a shuttle. SLS is a powerful rocket that will be used for missions beyond low Earth orbit, including the Artemis program, which aims to return astronauts to the Moon.
The space shuttle helped solve the challenge of cost-effective and reusable space transportation. It provided a way to transport crew and cargo to and from space, allowing for more frequent and affordable access to space compared to earlier single-use rocket designs.
The Space Shuttle Columbia, on which Kalpana Chawla was a member of the crew, disintegrated upon re-entry into the Earth's atmosphere on February 1, 2003. A breach in the shuttle's thermal protection system caused by damage to the shuttle's wing during launch led to the tragedy.
It is cheaper and more efficient.
The space shuttle had three main components: the orbiter, external tank, and solid rocket boosters. The orbiter had wings and resembled a plane. The external tank was a large orange tank, and the solid rocket boosters were two white rocket boosters attached to the sides.
its really both, it goes up like a rocket and comes down like a plane
The next space shuttle to be launched by NASA will be the Space Launch System (SLS), not a shuttle. SLS is a powerful rocket that will be used for missions beyond low Earth orbit, including the Artemis program, which aims to return astronauts to the Moon.
No. Space shuttles are Too Dangerous: Challenger and Columbia, RIP. NASA is going to build a new rocket to send people in to space, but, there will be no more space shuttles.
The space shuttle helped solve the challenge of cost-effective and reusable space transportation. It provided a way to transport crew and cargo to and from space, allowing for more frequent and affordable access to space compared to earlier single-use rocket designs.
The Space Shuttle Columbia, on which Kalpana Chawla was a member of the crew, disintegrated upon re-entry into the Earth's atmosphere on February 1, 2003. A breach in the shuttle's thermal protection system caused by damage to the shuttle's wing during launch led to the tragedy.
Space shuttle launches were discontinued due to safety concerns, high costs, and shifts in space exploration priorities. The space shuttles were designed in the 1970s and were becoming increasingly outdated and expensive to maintain. NASA shifted its focus to developing new spacecraft and fostering partnerships with commercial space companies for more cost-effective and sustainable access to space.
The launch pad (even hours after launch) is not a place you'd want to be.See the related link for more information.
Solid rocket boosters provide additional thrust during liftoff to help launch the space shuttle into orbit. They are also more cost-effective and reliable than liquid-fueled rockets. Additionally, the boosters can be jettisoned after use, contributing to the shuttle's overall efficiency.
You're thinking of the "Space Shuttle". But the statement is technically incorrect,because the last Space Shuttle mission flew in July 2012, and the remaining Shuttlesare all nailed to the floor in museums, so they don't land that way any more.
Unfortunately there are no more space shuttle launches or landings. The last space shuttle landing was by Space Shuttle Atlantis on July 21 at 5:57 a.m. EDT.