There is no direct relationship between the eccentricity and the average distance from the Sun.
Of course, the distance from the Sun will vary as the planet orbits the Sun. The more eccentric the orbit, the bigger the relative change between closest approach and the point furthest from the Sun.
When Earth orbits the sun, its eccentricity of the orbit is only 0.017. That's very close to 0, a perfect circle. So when it's at its closest to the sun (perihelion) , it doesn't make a difference.
The distance between crests( like in ocean waves) is referred to as it's wave length. Wave length also has direct effect on it's frequency, how often the wave repeats.
Well, honey, there's no direct relationship between a planet's diameter and its position from the sun. Planets can vary in size regardless of their distance from the sun. It's like saying the size of your shoes determines how far you live from the nearest grocery store - it just doesn't work like that in the cosmic neighborhood.
Solar irradiance is the amount of solar energy received per unit area. It directly influences air temperature by warming the Earth's surface when absorbed. Higher solar irradiance levels lead to higher air temperatures, while lower levels result in cooler temperatures.
If you could cross space directly and ignore Newton's laws like in Star Trek, You would need to cross between 54,710,000 and 401,307,000 kilometers depending on the current orbital/precession status of both planets. However, since current Earth spacecraft burn and coast into an elliptical orbit around the sun such that Mars' gravity will catch the spacecraft; the travel distance to Mars is less than about half of the circumference of Mar's orbit, or about 715 million kilometers, and more than about half of the circumference of the Earth's orbit, or about 470 million kilometers. Differences in designs of spacecraft can change these numbers drastically. Hence it is usually easier to simply refer to the direct line-of-sight distance between the planets.
There is no direct relationship between distance and time. Two airplanescan easily cover very different distances in the same amount of time.There can be an indirect relationship, that depends on speed.
the relationship between pressure and volume a direct or inverse?
Effort and distance have a direct relationship. The more distance you cover, the more effort you generally need to exert. This is because you are expending energy to travel a longer distance, which can lead to fatigue.
There is no direct relationship
There is no direct relationship between the rotation of a planet (which governs day length) and a planets distance from the sun. The nature of the planets spin is more to do with the formation of the system early on, by large impacts of the more numerous bodies that would have been around.
There is no direct relationship. However another name for length is distance and if you divide time into distance you get speed (if it takes you one hour to travel 10 miles, then you are going at 10 miles an hour).
direct
there is no direct relationship. they are antithetical.
No.
The root mean square distance is a measure of how far particles move on average in a system. In diffusion, particles move randomly and spread out over time. The root mean square distance increases as diffusion occurs, showing a direct relationship between the two.
There is no direct relationship.
a direct relationship.